saracat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 03:28 PM
Original message |
Is it just me, or do they seem to be going after Theresa more? |
|
From the beer drinking to the apology, They seem to be attacking her. Is this because they went so overboard on John they have nothing left? And why have they stopped covering Edwards, again????
|
Free2BMe
(535 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 03:30 PM
Response to Original message |
1. It's called ...run out of gas...nuthin' left. |
newsguyatl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 03:30 PM
Response to Original message |
2. i've said from the beginning, they'd |
|
target teresa in the final weeks.
and from the looks of it, it's going right according to plan.
the best thing is to just ignore it. (and keep teresa low profile)
|
saracat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. I don't know about that. When they attacked Hillary, |
|
it backfired.It backfired again when she ran for the Senate. I think this will backfire too.She doesn't need a low profile.
|
Triana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 03:31 PM
Response to Original message |
3. She's a strong, intelligent, independent woman - so was Hillary... |
|
...and that's the only reason they could ever come up with to hate Hillary so badly. Repugs HATE - AND I MEAN DEESPISE strong, intelligent, independent women.
Just because - they are. Theresa is a strong, intelligent, independent woman. They will not let up on her and they will spew endless hatred because of it.
It's just their M.O.
|
RevCheesehead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
...they're scared 'cuz one day, we WILL have that office! :)
|
nonconformist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 03:32 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Because they can't run on their record |
|
They have to constantly look for small, insignificant things to harp on because it's ALL THEY'VE GOT.
|
chiburb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 03:34 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Do you mean the RW or certain DUers? |
|
One seems especially eager to keep her muzzled and out of sight, though some of his threads eventually get locked. Sometimes it's hard to tell the players without a scorecard...
|
saracat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. I was on that thread too. That was weird. Almost like |
|
he was in the fifties or somrthing and wanted the little woman muzzled.Made me wonder who he is voting for LOL!
|
chiburb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. And in another he called O'Reilly's victim a "golddigger".. |
|
I suspect he has "issues"...
(I actually did a search, cut and pasted his quotes, and was ready to challenge him WHEN HIS THREAD WAS LOCKED! What a waste of 15 minutes!)
|
saracat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Wow! Really ??? But does he seem to support Kerry?? |
DemocracyInaction
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 03:35 PM
Response to Original message |
8. I wouldn't doubt it and expected it |
|
Not only is this the way the Bush's work but it's all they have left. And I can see them not covering Edwards because of the WOMEN. Right now this is where the key to the election rests. The security Moms with little kids would relate to him. You can bet they have orders to bury him in the dust bin. Actually, Kerry should have him by his side right now with the kids in tow.
|
saracat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. Good point. I think we need to get |
Ruby Romaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 03:38 PM
Response to Original message |
10. one rove technique is to make things terrible for family members |
|
who wants to subject loved ones to that?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:28 PM
Response to Original message |