Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Stolen Honor" reportedly funded by NRA, violates Campaign Finance Law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 03:51 PM
Original message
"Stolen Honor" reportedly funded by NRA, violates Campaign Finance Law
This was posted over at Atrios about 40 minutes ago. Apparently a credible source has told the Brady Campaign that "documentary" Stolen Honor was secretly funded by the NRA. This would be a blatant violation of campaign finance law.

Here's a letter sent out by StopTheNRA, explaining the allegations:

Dear StoptheNRA member:

Can it be true that the NRA is behind the Stolen Honor "documentary" attacking John Kerry to be aired in part or in its entirety by Sinclair Broadcasting?

We have received credible information from a source inside the NRA that the NRA is a significant funder of the Stolen Honor "documentary" which is scheduled to be aired on 62 stations owned by Sinclair Broadcasting in late October. This "documentary" is the source of much controversy as it is a blatant political attack on a presidential candidate days before an election and is being aired by a broadcast company owned by supporters of President Bush. They are characterizing it as "news" and claiming not to be subject to election laws.

The NRA has made no secret of its disdain for election laws and using its resources to try and get around these laws and impact the election. The NRA has a history of trying to circumvent these laws by attempting to buy TV stations, expressing desires to broadcast from Mexico or even from a ship offshore in international waters. By allegedly funding this "documentary" and working with an existing pro-Bush broadcaster to air it, they are succeeding where they have failed in the past. They need to be stopped from making this end-run around our nation's election laws.

Consider this:

The Assistant General Counsel of the NRA, James H. Warner, appears in the "documentary" as someone who is highly critical of John Kerry. Is this just a coincidence?

We have been told by a source inside the NRA (whom we cannot identify to protect him and his family) that the NRA is a significant funder of Stolen Honor. The producers of Stolen Honor, Red, White and Blue Productions, a for-profit company, brag on their website that they have received funding from "individuals and entities nationwide" and are actively soliciting contributions. Since when do for-profit companies or news organizations solicit donations?

There is no reporting of contributors by Red, White and Blue Productions. No accountability. Nothing. Is this just an attempt by the producers to circumvent campaign finance laws and allow their supporters to hide their identities?

Sinclair Broadcasting and the NRA have shown their support for President Bush through endorsements and contributions. Is Red, White and Blue Productions acting as the go-between in order for the NRA to get its wish and use the airwaves to further its extreme political agenda?

All groups who are involved in broadcast activities that attempt to influence elections (including the so-called 527 organizations) must disclose their donors. Why does Red, White and Blue Productions think it is exempt from this requirement?

The Washington bureau chief and top reporter for Sinclair Broadcast Group was fired after he criticized the company's plans to produce a news program based on a "documentary" critical of John Kerry. After his firing he was "escorted out of the building." Are these people afraid the truth is going to come out?

These are questions that need to be asked and investigated. Our nation's campaign finance laws are there to make sure the rich and powerful do not take over our election process. We supported campaign finance reform and the NRA opposed it. They even lost their challenge to those laws in court. What lengths will they go to by-pass these laws?

Time is running short. The election is almost here.

How You Can Help:

1) Call the offices of Campaign Finance Reform sponsors Senators McCain (202-224-2235) and Senator Feingold (202-224-5323) and demand that the Senate investigate who is funding the "documentary" produced by Red, White and Blue Productions and to be aired in part by Sinclair Broadcasting.

2) Call Red White and Blue Productions at 717-213-4955 and demand they release the names of the individuals and entities contributing to the making of this "documentary."

3) Forward this e-mail to as many friends and relatives as you can. Time is running out.

4) Please click here to make a contribution to our efforts to get to the truth. Sensible gun laws need protection today.

Thank you

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hope this pans out.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. whoa.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. posted here earlier too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Way to go DU.
I did a search before I posted and came up with nothing. I was surprised that nobody had posted this already.

I'm glad to see that someone already did. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yeah, But Skinner Has "Gravitas"
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. it helps to make your subject title informative
"OMG!" and "Unbelievable e-mail I just recieved" just sound a little like... well, crying wolf! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocracyInaction Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. The sad thing is--and Rove knows it--
this garbage is going to run. After the election, someone might (MIGHT) spank someone's hand and that's all. There have been so many things come out about this whole administration and the republicans and absolutely nothing has been done to them or stuck to them. It's depressing and I am just holding my breath about this. In your gut, you know this could slit Kerry's throat in just enough battlegrounds after all the fighting he has done. It's a disgrace. This country is a disgrace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. *gasp*
I've been "duped" by Skinner :wow:

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. People tuning into Joan of Arcadia are going to be pissed in ME tonight...
SHOW TITLE: A POW Story: Politics, Pressure and the Media
CATEGORY: Special
SYNOPSIS: Host Jeff Barnd examines media bias and the influence of documentaries, including ``Stolen Honor,'' during the 2004 political campaigns.
CHANNEL: 13 (WGME)
DATE / TIME: October 22: 8:00PM
LENGTH: 60 Minutes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. prepare to barf, kids
Edited on Fri Oct-22-04 04:06 PM by Neecy
Host Jeff Barnd examines media bias and the influence of documentaries, including ``Stolen Honor,'' during the 2004 political campaigns.

How much do we want to bet that this will be a false claim of 'liberal media bias'...coming from another conservative media source (which, of course, they ALL are now).

Black is white, up is down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chiyo-chichi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. If they really want to examine the influence of documentaries
on the '04 election... they might start by looking at the amazon.com sales rankings...


Fahrenheit 9/11.......#4
Outfoxed..............#45
Going Upriver.........#48
Bush Family Fortunes..#61
Stolen Honor..........#71
Uncovered: the Whole Truth About the Iraq War...#73
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. This would link NRA to the Moonies!
There are a number of threads here on DU linking the producers of "Stolen Honor" to Moon and other right-wing groups.

Hillary Clinton was right. There is a vast right-wing conspiracy. And they're all assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. An indirect relationship at best
Edited on Fri Oct-22-04 04:43 PM by starroute
Carlton Sherwood who supposedly produced the film did write a whitewash book on Moon a dozen years ago. But the other people involved with "Stolen Honor" have very different connections

Sherwood's "Red, White, and Blue Productions" seems to have no existence except as the producer of this one film. The address given for the company is c/o Quantum Communications, and Charlie Gerow, the head of Quantum, is also the spokesman for the film.

Gerow is a small-time conservative Republican in Harrisburg, PA, but strangely enough, when he ran unsuccessfully in Republican congressional primaries in 1998 and 2000, he got contributions from people like Grover Norquist, Jack Abramoff, and Richard Mellon Scaife.

Both Norquist and Abramoff are from the anti-government, dirty-tricks wing of the right, while Scaife is the great funder of anti-Clinton smears. What we've been finding on those threads you mention is that there is a whole network of people involved in right-wing direct-mail solicitation (some of it outright scams), in campaign smears going back to the Willie Horton ad in 1988, and in Karl Rove-style dirty tricks. Not to mention both the Buckhead and the rathergate.com aspects of the CBS memos flap and also Morton "purple heart bandaid" Blackwell. Even Karl Rove himself links to this network in several ways.

So I wouldn't be at all surprised if the NRA was a major funding source, but I feel sure we have yet to learn who was the actual instigator behind "Stolen Honor."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socks6 Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
40. norquist
Grover norquist is an NRA board member
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDaddyCaine Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. Credible source?
Edited on Fri Oct-22-04 04:13 PM by BigDaddyCaine
I dont know if i would call a group named StopTheNRA credible when it comes to talking about the NRA. :-) Edit, i better put a smile here before someone gets pissy.

And how does funding a show violate campaign finance law? The money didnt go to a canidate it went to a group called Red, White and Blue Productions, who make films.

Im on your side but i think we are throwing around some rumors here. Im not saying the NRA didnt pay for the show, i would bet they did, but im just not seeing how this is against any campaign finance laws. Point out my errors for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDaddyCaine Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. I am still wondering how this violates campaign finance laws? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socks6 Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
37. violating campaign finance laws
read the email from stop the NRA

It is against the law for an broadcast ad to be aired 60 days before an election. RWB made the ad and is airing it through an agreement with Sinclair. this is how they are getting around the law. pretty smart and sleazy. Also RWB is soliciting contributions, which is vert wierd for a for profit company. if not a violation then real close
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. Damn. And I thought that the Homeland Security money he got paid for it..
Sheesh. This is just as creepy! I still want to know the truth about Sherwood's contract with Homeland Security to produce and unproduced website.. and why another firm got the same contract later.. to the tune of 9.1 MILLION to produce it. I'd like to know more about that, as well. The NRA thing does NOT surprise me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steelangel Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
16. Well.. I am STILL waiting for Butler and his lawsuit against
Edited on Fri Oct-22-04 05:01 PM by Steelangel
Sinclair result... *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Me too. We should have heard something by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
17. A couple of quick questions...
First, did the FEC rules this film as a political advertisement falling under McCain-Feingold?

Second, does the above matter or not if the NRA did in fact donate monies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socks6 Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
38. anwers to a couple of quick questions
FEC has not ruled and would not until after the election and if the NRA did donate money it would have to be hard money and not soft money. Red white and blue should have to disclose their donors klije everyone else.

and also it does not matter if the fec ruled or not. it is illeghal to use anything but hard money to air a ad or mentioning a candidates name 60 days before an election.

Sinclair is just the conduit for the stolen honor which is basically an anti kerry infomercial
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olebrowser Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
20. We have been told by a source inside the NRA (whom we cannot identify to p
We have been told by a source inside the NRA (whom we cannot identify to protect him and his family) that the NRA is a significant funder of Stolen Honor


We need the name of the source inside the NRA, that would blow the lid off of the whole group, without a verified name this is just a rumor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Well Then, We'll Just Have To whisper About This Then
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. "We need the name of the source inside the NRA"
Oh, yah, that's the ticket!

Why protect him and his family? (sarcasm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Minded Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. I agree
Yeah name the People
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. You've got to be kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socks6 Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #28
41. nameing names
how about making red white and blue productions name the names of their funders instead of the whistleblower
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
22. Now's the time for us to fight back by digging deep into our pockets! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
26. I just watched the piece of excrement that SBG showed
and it was a sampler of all KKKarl Rove's typical dirty tricks. SBG had White House help in putting together their attack piece disguised as journalism. If provable, that too is a violation of elections law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
27. kick
This is too important. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Columbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
29. The Brady Campaign is just about as credible as the NRA
Meaning not at all.

Everyone is aware that the founder is a Republican right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socks6 Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #29
39. sarah brady
is a republican who endorsed bill clinton twice and is now supporting democrats for the last 12 years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
30. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Some may not know but we owe a huge salute to ...
the following to all vets who jumped on board and stayed the course with this cause below:

Oct. 21, 2004
LADIES & GENTLEMEN:

We won an at least partial victory!

Read the following from Cooper Brown, and my appended message below.

D*** & K*****

----- Original Message -----

From: @aol.com

To: k@cox.net ; @hotmail.com ; @comcast.net

Cc: @gsblaw.com ; @gsblaw.com ; @kininc.com

Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 3:39 PM

Subject: e-mail support letters

D --You should by now have received from our attorneys the complaint and Dick's declaration in msword or wordperfect format. In follow-up to our phone conversation this afternoon, when you send the complaint out to the veterans this evening, please advise them that their mission has been accomplished with respect to effort to let the FCC know of their support for the Veterans Institute complaint, and that they should at this point cease and desist from any further e-mail letters. Sinclair Group this afternoon invited the Institute's president, Dick Klass, along with Bobby Muller of V.V.A.F. to participate in the taping of a discussion segment (which also then took place this afternoon) that will be incorporated into their showing of "Stolen Honor" now renamed "A POW's Story" -- that will air Friday evening in Sinclair affiliate TV markets around the country (you have that list already). The vets should watch the program, and judge whether the program is reasonably fair. If anyone wishes to comment following the showing, they should send their comments to the FCC with copy to the Veterans Institute, at vets@veteransinstitute.org (BUT WITHOUT COPY TO THE SINCLAIR ATTORNEYS).-- Cooper

NOTE FROM :

Ladies & Gentlemen:

We unfortunately shut down the Sinclair attorney’s servers with the volume of mail you all sent to the FCC, Cc to them. They’re alleging harassment. While I certainly regret any inconvenience experienced by their law firm, in truth, the limitations of their hardware certainly don’t constitute harassment; rather, it suggests that those who take on the veterans of this nation should have the computing power to keep up with a legitimate response. The now several thousands of us who responded have done so in the legal and legitimate attempt to join onto a legal action. Indeed, we have all stood up individually to name ourselves as interested parties intending status as co-plaintiffs. So indicating to the Defendant's advocate seemed appropriate to me.

Further communications to the FCC should exclude courtesy copies to the Sinclair Broadcasting Group’s attorneys. That courtesy has interfered with their capacity to conduct normal business, a regrettable fact. I can certainly appreciate the unfortunate inconvenience experienced by them.

THANKS AGAIN FOR YOUR IMMEDIATE RESPONSE!

D** & K*****

I am removing names to protect the brave at this point. I can only tell you that these are the most bravest vets and their loved ones I have met in a long time to do what they did.

Here's a copy of the letter that they put together for all the vets and the families to send to Sinclair and their attorneys...


-----Original Message-----
From:
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 5:49 PM
To:
Subject: Sinclair Suit Plaintiff Action (!V)


NEXT STEP IN COUNTERING SINCLAIR BROADCASTING:

We have a shot now of hammering Sinclair Broadcasting by individually indicating our intentions to become co-plaintiffs in the suit brought against Sinclair Broadcasting by signing onto the letter below.

The letter below is a modified version of the original Beyond Vietnam letter which we all endorsed. Please do the following:

1. copy the following text;

2. paste the text onto a new e-mail letter;

3. sign with your name an address at the end of the letter;

4. copy the FCC addresses from the letter (above the letter as addressees) into the TO block;

5. copy the FCC firm contact addresses to the Cc; block;

6. copy the Veterans Institute for Security & Democracy onto the Cc block at vets@veteransinstitute.org

7. press send and have the satisfaction of nailing the lid once and for all on these folks


Any questions, feel free to e-mail back to

Also, I will be forwarding an abbreviated copy of the lawsuit to each of you tomorrow. The full complaint is available on request.


As always, thank you for your partnership!

D & K



LETTER TO FCC

_________________________________________



Federal Communications Commission

445 12th Street, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20554



Attn:

Michael Powell, Chairman

Michael.Powell@fcc.gov

Commissioner Jonathan S. Adelstein

Jonathan.Adelstein@fcc.gov

Commissioner Kathleen Q. Abernathy

Kathleen.Abernathy@fcc.gov

Commissioner Michael J. Copp

Michael.Copp@fcc.gov

Commissioner Kevin J. Martin

Kevin.Martin@fcc.gov



Cc: Veterans Institute for Security & Democracy

Vets@veteransinstitute.org

Communications Counsel for Sinclair Broadcast Group

bfaber@sbgnet.com

Kathryn.Schmeltzer@shawpittman.com

Robert Baker, Media Bureau

Robert.Baker@fcc.gov





Dear Commissioners:



I am writing in support of the Complaint filed October 19th, 2004 by the Veterans Institute for Security and Democracy, and to urge you to act immediately. I also seek to intervene as a co-complainant in the Veteran Institute’s Complaint. Sinclair Broadcast Group should not be allowed to use a federally issued broadcast license to promote its own partisan views and to unfairly influence the outcome of a hotly contested Presidential election.



First there were the attacks on Senator John McCain, which were later proven false. Then there were the attacks on Senator Max Cleland, also later proven false. Now there are the attacks on Senator John Kerry, which are now, at every turn, being proven false.



The personal attacks on Senator Kerry’s record of distinguished military service in Vietnam do not serve our nation, or its people in making informed presidential election decisions any more than would attacks on President Bush for what he did to get into the National Guard during the Vietnam War, or what he may or may not have done while in the Guard.



For veterans such as ourselves, this year’s election would be better served if President Bush were to account to the American public, as Commander-in-Chief, for the loss of respect of the United States among our historical allies; for the loss of respect of our military due to the mishandling and abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib; for the ever-increasing number of dead and wounded soldiers returning from Iraq with no end in sight; and for his administration’s failure to live up to this nation’s obligations to its veterans.



As a veteran, I care deeply about preserving our democratic values. One of the most important of those values is that broadcast stations treat political candidates and campaign issues fairly. I urge you to uphold this right, and grant the Veteran’s Institute’s Complaint without delay.



It is time we moved Beyond Vietnam!



____________________________

Signature



Address:



I salute every one of the vets who stood up and took action. You saw the results tonight. Sinclair not only learned all of us were out there but they learned the meaning of real soldiers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shivaji Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
32. With 6 working days before election, this may be too late?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. they ran ads to this effect in as many papers as they could
afford. if you read from the bottom to the top of the emails, you will notice the top email is someone saying they have changed the special to include someone who will be interviewed from Kerry's side. I'd say that helped out tonight, so it wasn't too late.

http://news.corporate.findlaw.com/prnewswire/20041021/21oct2004124731.html

Veterans Institute Files Formal FCC Complaint Against Sinclair Broadcasting Group; Recommends Opportunity for Response and Public Discussion

WASHINGTON, Oct. 21 /PRNewswire/ --

WASHINGTON, Oct. 21 /PRNewswire/ -- Yesterday, the Veterans Institute for Security and Democracy announced its filing of a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission against Sinclair Broadcast Group. This is the first complaint filed with the FCC against the Sinclair Broadcasting Group.

more...

The complaint alleges that Sinclair Broadcasting Group's plan to air the video, "Stolen Honor," is a political attack on Senator Kerry and his Vietnam war record, and not a bona fide newscast. FCC policy prohibits a broadcast station from airing an attack on one candidate without giving the supporters of opposing candidates the right to demand an equal opportunity to express their views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
33. I dropped out of the NRA a long time ago, left with my hunting gear
and didn't look back. These people lost touch with reality. I'd believe they helped fund this. They think they are on the side of Veterans and Veterans have guns. Think again, Fools of the NRA. Veterans have guns without NRA memberships.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RapidCreek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
35. I'll be eating dinner with the Senate Minority leader on Sunday...
with a bunch of other folks.

I'll be sure and pass along to him the sentiments expressed in the above letter.

RC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 03:59 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. just an opinion.....
Edited on Sat Oct-23-04 04:18 AM by dallan
but I think this close to election day, the very few people who are undecided (5%?), and haven't made up their mind with ALL that's been said, shown on TV and the debates, are going to just simply go with whoever they think is going to win on the last day. Sadly there are people like that, and there are those who are only effected by the commercials.

So, It's up to voter turnout at this point.

click 'image' for a good laugh!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC