newsguyatl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 04:00 PM
Original message |
Nader goes to Supreme Court -- I ain't jokin folks |
|
For Immediate Release
For Further Information Kevin B. Zeese 202-265-4000
NADER TO APPEAL OHIO SUPREME COURT RULING Democratic campaign of harrassment, intimidation and abusive litigation should not be allowed to stand.
Washington, DC: The Nader/Camejo campaign submitted nearly 15,000 signatures in Ohio to meet a 5000 signature requirement. Until September 28, Nader/Camejo was on the ballot with more than 6464 valid signatures. The Democrats hired Kirkland and Ellis to subpoena and harangue our circulators and challenge the validity of the signatures in an administrative review. This review caused the total valid signatures to fall under the 5000 required, thus forcing the campaign to challenge the 8009 discounted signatures that were not properly examined by Ohio’s counties, in addition to signatures wrongly discounted.
In a split decision, the Ohio Supreme Court has denied Nader/Camejo a place on the Ohio ballot claiming, remarkably, that a lawsuit filed within six days (two of which were a weekend) after being removed from the ballot by the Secretary of State, should have been filed during the time in which Nader was presumptively on the ballot or months earlier to challenge the constitutional infirmities in Ohio law. The Ohio Supreme Court concluded it “was too late” to force the Secretary to review its erroneous procedure and change the ballot, in large part because absentee ballots had already gone out without Nader/Camejo on it and it “would endanger Ohio’s election preparations.” The result is that the Ohio Supreme Court allowed the Secretary of State to avoid processing its voter registration backlog in the counties and did not force it to reexamine more than 8009 signatures improperly discounted because the 88 counties of Ohio were not operating off the only up-to-date database, in the capital, when it reviewed the Nader petitions. As the dissent, which also found the Ohio law unconstitutional notes, “to assume it is too late to correct the errors of the Secretary of State is to sell the electoral process short.” “The law and process relied upon by the county boards and the Secretary of State to remove Nader from the ballot are dubious.”
Dubious and unconstitutional are understatements of the Kafkaesque process the Nader/Camejo campaign has been put through in Ohio after turning in nearly TRIPLE the required signatures. Perfectly legitimate circulators and voters have been disenfranchised because of backlogged databases and other shenanigans. Our state coordinator had all her signatures ignored because her signature when she registered to vote at age 18 did not match her signature now as a 50-year old! The only “endangerment to Ohio’s election preparations” is the truth: This is a nonsensical process where if you are on the ballot and then erroneously removed you are prejudiced for not having sued while you were on the ballot (where presumably the relief requested would have been to be put on the ballot again)! The people of Ohio have been done a great disservice. The Nader/Camejo campaign will appeal to the United States Supreme Court.
-- Paid for by Nader for President 2004
|
newsguyatl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 04:06 PM
Response to Original message |
Snivi Yllom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 04:08 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I have to give him props for that.
|
fujiyama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Too bad he wasn't this enthusiastic about getting Bush out of office.
|
onenote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 04:10 PM
Response to Original message |
|
the court sits on the case until after the election. If Bush loses, the court rules (5-4, of course) in Nader's favor, voids the election and orders a do-over.
onenote
|
blondeatlast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 04:13 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Proof positive the man doesn't love his country, only himself. |
|
May he and his sycophant minions rot in the nation they created if Commander Bunnypants is elected for the first time.
I almost never say this word, but when I do, my family runs. I'm typing it now:
FUCK. HEAD. Enjoy watching everything positive you've ever done be destroyed by the misadministration you enabled.
Did I mention that Nader's a FUCKHEAD?
|
blondeatlast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 04:15 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Is this type of thing supposed to instill confidence, trust, in him and |
|
and ATTRACT us?
What the hell is his game?
Can anybody explain what the hell is going on?
|
arewenotdemo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. Not at all hard to understand |
|
Nadir views the Democratic nominees (Gore in 2000, Kerry in 2004) as usurping his political base, and will consequently do anything within his power to undermine the Party. He fervently hopes to get Bush re-selected.
This should be evident to everyone by now and no surprise.
|
Sparkle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 04:15 PM
Response to Original message |
6. What an egotistical BASTARD! |
|
Can't he get it thru his thick skull that he doesn't get enough votes to win the presidency?
|
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 04:19 PM
Response to Original message |
8. He's rather pathetic these days, isn't he? nt |
fujiyama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 04:19 PM
Response to Original message |
9. I wouldn't have believed |
|
the Supreme Court would take this case, but then again I never thought they'd take Bush v. Gore either.
Yeah, Rehnquist, Scalia, et al. will ensure Nader is on the ballot.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:09 AM
Response to Original message |