Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nader goes to Supreme Court -- I ain't jokin folks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
newsguyatl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 04:00 PM
Original message
Nader goes to Supreme Court -- I ain't jokin folks

For Immediate Release

For Further Information
Kevin B. Zeese
202-265-4000

NADER TO APPEAL OHIO SUPREME COURT RULING
Democratic campaign of harrassment, intimidation and abusive litigation
should not be allowed to stand.

Washington, DC: The Nader/Camejo campaign submitted nearly 15,000
signatures in Ohio to meet a 5000 signature requirement. Until September
28, Nader/Camejo was on the ballot with more than 6464 valid signatures.
The Democrats hired Kirkland and Ellis to subpoena and harangue our
circulators and challenge the validity of the signatures in an
administrative review. This review caused the total valid signatures to
fall under the 5000 required, thus forcing the campaign to challenge the
8009 discounted signatures that were not properly examined by Ohio’s
counties, in addition to signatures wrongly discounted.

In a split decision, the Ohio Supreme Court has denied Nader/Camejo a
place on the Ohio ballot claiming, remarkably, that a lawsuit filed
within six days (two of which were a weekend) after being removed from
the ballot by the Secretary of State, should have been filed during the
time in which Nader was presumptively on the ballot or months earlier to
challenge the constitutional infirmities in Ohio law. The Ohio Supreme
Court concluded it “was too late” to force the Secretary to review its
erroneous procedure and change the ballot, in large part because
absentee ballots had already gone out without Nader/Camejo on it and it
“would endanger Ohio’s election preparations.” The result is that the
Ohio Supreme Court allowed the Secretary of State to avoid processing
its voter registration backlog in the counties and did not force it to
reexamine more than 8009 signatures improperly discounted because the 88
counties of Ohio were not operating off the only up-to-date database, in
the capital, when it reviewed the Nader petitions. As the dissent, which
also found the Ohio law unconstitutional notes, “to assume it is too
late to correct the errors of the Secretary of State is to sell the
electoral process short.” “The law and process relied upon by the county
boards and the Secretary of State to remove Nader from the ballot are
dubious.”

Dubious and unconstitutional are understatements of the Kafkaesque
process the Nader/Camejo campaign has been put through in Ohio after
turning in nearly TRIPLE the required signatures. Perfectly legitimate
circulators and voters have been disenfranchised because of backlogged
databases and other shenanigans. Our state coordinator had all her
signatures ignored because her signature when she registered to vote at
age 18 did not match her signature now as a 50-year old! The only
“endangerment to Ohio’s election preparations” is the truth: This is a
nonsensical process where if you are on the ballot and then erroneously
removed you are prejudiced for not having sued while you were on the
ballot (where presumably the relief requested would have been to be put
on the ballot again)! The people of Ohio have been done a great
disservice. The Nader/Camejo campaign will appeal to the United States
Supreme Court.


--
Paid for by Nader for President 2004


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
newsguyatl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. wha??
no one cares about this?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snivi Yllom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. the guy is tenacious
I have to give him props for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. LOL
Too bad he wasn't this enthusiastic about getting Bush out of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. here's a scenario
the court sits on the case until after the election. If Bush loses, the court rules (5-4, of course) in Nader's favor, voids the election and orders a do-over.

onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Proof positive the man doesn't love his country, only himself.
May he and his sycophant minions rot in the nation they created if Commander Bunnypants is elected for the first time.

I almost never say this word, but when I do, my family runs. I'm typing it now:

FUCK. HEAD. Enjoy watching everything positive you've ever done be destroyed by the misadministration you enabled.

Did I mention that Nader's a FUCKHEAD?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Is this type of thing supposed to instill confidence, trust, in him and
and ATTRACT us?

What the hell is his game?

Can anybody explain what the hell is going on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Not at all hard to understand
Nadir views the Democratic nominees (Gore in 2000, Kerry in 2004) as usurping his political base, and will consequently do anything within his power to undermine the Party. He fervently hopes to get Bush re-selected.

This should be evident to everyone by now and no surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. What an egotistical BASTARD!
Can't he get it thru his thick skull that he doesn't get enough votes to win the presidency?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. He's rather pathetic these days, isn't he? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. I wouldn't have believed
the Supreme Court would take this case, but then again I never thought they'd take Bush v. Gore either.

Yeah, Rehnquist, Scalia, et al. will ensure Nader is on the ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC