Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

POLL: Kerry 49 Bush 47 Who did you vote for in 2000 Bush 50%!!!!!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 08:29 PM
Original message
POLL: Kerry 49 Bush 47 Who did you vote for in 2000 Bush 50%!!!!!!!
Edited on Sat Oct-23-04 08:36 PM by Quixote1818
Democratic Corps Poll: Kerry 49 Bush 47
Who did you vote for in 2000 Bush 50 Gore 44 OMFG!

This is an amazing statistic because if these exact people had been contacted in 2000 it would have short changed Gore by seven points YET TODAY it has Kerry up by two!!!!!! That is an EIGHT POINT SHIFT to our side!!!! It means Kerry could actually be up by eight points!



http://www.democracycorps.com/reports/surveys/Democracy_Corps_October_20-21_2004_Survey.pdf



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. a lot of people
don't like to admit they voted for the losing candidate.

In 1961, 70 percent of those polled said they had voted for President Kennedy. Kennedy got about 50 percent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tweed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Gore did win in 2000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Good Point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. When was Kennedy assassinated?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Kennedy was assassinated
in 1963. In November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Kennedy was also a LOT more popular than Bush is now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. that's not the point
this is the type of question that people lie to pollsters about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. Correct, and that was verified in 2001
A survey of who people vted for in 2000 revealed that a huge chunk of Gore voters denied supporting him. If people were telling the truth, Bush would have received 60+% six months earlier.

Actualy, if someone had proposed these two numbers to me, I would have estimated at leasr 55% of the current voters claimed to have voted for Bush in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RafterMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. But we can't generalize from that instance
Why would people lie (or misremember) their 2000 vote *if they were going to switch this year*?

Rather than making them "right" about voting with the winner, it would mean they are admitting they were wrong in 2000 and are reversing themselves for 2004.

When you add in the fact that people are reversing themselves, that undermines the whole psychological basis for the lie theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. All of that makes sense
It would be an extremely interesting test. Take a block of voters and ask them who they supported in 2000. A day or so later, have someone else ask the same group who they support this year, followed by who they supported in 2000.

This stuff makes me dizzy. No wonder I prefer predicting sporting events to forecasting opinions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CAcyclist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. Maybe their statistical sampling was poorer in 1961
Maybe all the old people who had voted against Kennedy had died by the time the poll was taken. ;P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DAGDA56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Makes me wonder...do you think there are ANY Gore voters from 2000...
...who would vote for * today? I mean, how many actual voters do you think have crossed over to the dark side in 4 years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. You know, I think some people have bought all the post 9/11 hype
and emotionally "bonded" with Bush (as some opinion research wags have suggested) after the event, regardless of Bush's complete incompetence and failure both before, during, and after those awful events.

And I bet two or three of the "bonded with Bush" people are Gore voters.

I noted in another thread that Democracy Corps has had results quite similar to those of the Economist this year. And both polls feature large samples, three day windows, and relative stability (I guess anything is stable compared to Gallup.

But I'm no pollmeister.

I'll leave dissection of this one to Ruy Teixeira and Alan Abramowitz at www.emergingdemocraticmajority.com and Chris Bowers at www.mydd.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fix your link. Error 404. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Fixed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonicx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. that's normal
Edited on Sat Oct-23-04 08:33 PM by sonicx
people lie and say they voted for the winner all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Is it possible that people are lying now and saying that they'll vote
for Bush because they think it's somehow unpatriotic (in time of war) to tell the truth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgrrrll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I have been wondering about that too. I wonder if people are afraid
to tell someone they do not know on the phone that they do not support the chimp. They are such fear mongering bullies I would not be surprised if some people have this feeling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clydefrand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. My thoughts exactly for some time now.
I've wondered all summer/fall that people don't want to tell a pollster for whom they will be voting because they may fear that the caller who obviously has their phone number and name just might be someone associated with the Patriot Act and his highness Ashcroft. And many people simply won't answer or hang up.

I think we're going to win regardless of what Mr. Teeth Novak says and all the others who are calling for it for Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. I don't think they knowingly do it...their memory just
changes somehow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Most everyone here voted for the winner in 2000.
Except for the odd freeper darting about here during the homestretch...the "dead-enders" and "Boosh loyalists".
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canuckybee Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. I actually know republicans
who voted for Bush in 2000, will be voting for Kerry this time, and admit they would lie if polled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I don't lie when polled but when I am with Republican clients I become
a God fearing Republican. It's that or risk loosing a client! I hope that dosent make me a bad person, just trying to keep food on the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Me, I just have to shut up at work when the owners are around.
But we do have a strong cadre of Kerry voters in the office activated to raise money, share info, mobilize, etc.

With customers, one does what one must to be agreeable and to retain the business. It's a tough spot, and I hope it doesn't cause you too much stress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DAGDA56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I always hate to use the analogy, but it sounds like Nazi Germany...
...and I myself look around the restaurant when my dad and I start talking politics (he's 75 and a rabid Kerry fan/Bush hater)...It's comments like yours and others that make me think there's a sort of intellectual underground that will only emerge on Election Day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jasper 91 Donating Member (483 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. Qiixote , it's 'Democracy' corps
Not 'Democratic' corps . A small detail , but people will think it is a poll by the Democratic Party otherwise , and think its biased .

I hope you don't think I'm pernickety , I'm not usually .:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. I would have dismissed them
as being a partisan poll, but I think they were very close in '00.

These guys are good. I think Carville is on their team or part of the oganization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skordane Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. How Many
I just do not see how Bush's poll Numbers could be as high as they are saying. Come On. How many people that actually voted for Gore in 2000 are now going to vote for Bush. Hardly Any. Plus the Nader voters in 2000 will fall for Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Nader
Pround Nader voter from 2000 who is sending my absentee ballot in on Monday with a little black bubble next to Kerry/Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. Hi MJDuncan1982!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Thank You Much
I usually only join conservative boards to hone my skills but I need a breather.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC