Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why abortion rate is up in Bush years

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 01:36 PM
Original message
Why abortion rate is up in Bush years
http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/editorial/outlook/2851283 This
story was run in the Houston Chronicle.

Oct. 17, 2004, 1:27AM

Why abortion rate is up in Bush years
By GLEN HAROLD STASSEN and GARY KRANE

I, Glen, am a Christian ethicist, and trained in statistical analysis. I am
consistently pro-life. My son David is one witness. For my family,
"pro-life" is personal. My wife caught rubella in the eighth week of her
pregnancy. We decided not to terminate, to love and raise our baby. David
is legally blind and severely handicapped; he also is a blessing to us and
to the world. Gary Krane is an investigative journalist.

We look at the fruits of political policies more than words. We analyzed
the data on abortion during the Bush presidency. There is no single source
for this information -- federal reports go only to the year 2000, and many
states do not report -- but we found enough data to identify trends. Our
findings are disturbing.

Abortion was decreasing. When President Bush took office, the nation's
abortion rates were at a 24-year low, after a 17.4 percent decline during
the 1990s. This was a steady decrease averaging 1.7 percent per year. (The
data come from Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life using the Guttmacher
Institute's studies.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Scairp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well DUH!!!!
Edited on Sun Oct-24-04 01:57 PM by Scairp
When you push abstinence only, and have pharmacists refusing to fill prescriptions for birth control, then yeah, abortions will increase. Even if people cannot get reliable BC, they are still going to have sex and take the risk of pregnancy. It doesn't take a genius to figure that one out. That's just one of the many, many reason why the morans in the WH need to GO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncteechur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. The abortion rate will be inversely proportional to the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. To each his own
as long as those who love their handicapped children, do not want to force their opinion on when life begins, or the ethics of birthing a child that they cannot care for on others. I am also pro-life and pro-choice. I do not believe that pro-life equates to pro "potential" life.

I worked in a state hospital for the mentally challenged for a few years.

I cannot tell you how many abandoned, severely handicapped children were placed there for the state to care for. Hundreds. Many were blind, and without the ability to be ambulatory, unable to do anything else but lay on the floor, on a mat, and incontinent,and unable to communicate or even eat, in any way with anyone, for the rest of their lives.

There was an incident once, where a distraught mother who could not take it any longer, in desperation, wheeled one of these children up to the door of the hospital and left it there for staff to discover.

And shame, sometimes with the accompanying punishment of a forced pregnancy, has been brought back into the equation by the Pro life people. Shame on a woman to be interested in and enjoy sex.

The application of shame results in trying to cover up the results of that sexual activity and a surreptitious visit to an abortion clinic.

I read a couple of years ago, that more than 500 newborn babies were left at the doorsteps of firehouses and police stations in Texas, abandoned by their mothers and fathers. This occured within a period of six months. During that time, 50 newborn babies were dumped into dumpsters and died of suffocation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC