Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What were the pre-Iowa polls like during the Democratic primary?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 02:45 PM
Original message
What were the pre-Iowa polls like during the Democratic primary?
I recall Kerry's and Edwards' performance being a complete suprise to the "experts" on (DU and beyond). Just an interesting factoid for anyone who likes to cite polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think Kerry was up by a couple over Dean and Gephardt
Then Kerry went on to win by ten or fifteen points!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. According to most
Dean was supposed to blow away the competition, and Kerry was third or fourth. Edwards was second, third, fourth depending on whom you believed. The caucus I attended had Kerry supporters up the ying yang and we who caucused for Edwards were viable after a second session. In this district, Kerry won, followed by Edwards and Gephardt. Kerry had a 30 minute special on a local TV station which was impressive. He spelled out his plans for America, which were the same then as they are now and that helped him at least here in eastern Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. My daughter is in Ames.
Unlike me, she has been a Kerry supporter since day one. I asked her why, and she convinced me.

She said her caucus had mainly Kerry supporters, with Edwards second. She was not surprised by the outcome nationally, and thinks that Edwards was a good choice for VP.

The kid is politically astute and very involved. I always listen to her about Iowa and national politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. At the very end
Edited on Sun Oct-24-04 03:01 PM by sandnsea
Kerry had taken the lead in most polls just days before the caucus. But he still ended up with 5-10 more points than even the late polls predicted. Edwards too. Seems it was that way in most early primary polls, even after Iowa. Later though, the undecideds broke for Edwards alot, I think it was a rejection of a perceived "coronation" by many.

Oh, and IA & NH was an extraordinary ground campaign at the very end, GOTV was masterfully executed. Just can't compete with a bunch of Vietnam vets who respect the contribution of every single worker and can get every ounce of work out of every volunteer!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Kerry won Iowa the same way the Red Sox won the ACLS
Heart. Yep I remember, the polls were narrow for him on the day of Iowa but then I got worried because he lost his voice, then he won a resounding victory, I always had been a fan of Kerry but that day put me officially in his camp. More I learn about Kerry, the more I like, just such an amazing guy. Best nominee of my life I must say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kerry was not far behind when you looked at internal numbers
he was going up in specific areas such as whether he is a good leader, likable ,on the issues etc. and his numbers were always good in new hampshire also but the only thing holding him back was that he was viewed as having a dead campaign. if he could change that they assumed he would rise in new hampshire. and i guess that's one reason for focus on iowa. a win in iowa would mean he would erase the negative view which was holding him back in new hampshire.

it took a while for these to show up in the final numbers but they did in the end.

but the media whores only focus on those final numbers mostly and not internals. so they were surprised by the outcome. but i guess if one followed the internal numbers they shouldn't be too surprised that Kerry (and Edwards) did well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC