This is also on the DU Op-Ed page, but in case you missed it, Neal Gabler's "Karl Rove: America's Mullah" in today's Los Angeles Times Opinion section should not be missed.
Why do conservatives behave like rabid underdogs, even after "winning" the 2000 election? Why did Bush promise to be a "uniter," then proceed to divide our country as never before? How does the administration get away with telling outrageous lies? Neal Gabler neatly, succinctly -- and terrifyingly -- lays it all out. The Times requires registering and logging in, but if only for this one article, it's worth the extra time and effort.
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-op-gabler24oct24,0,1987150.story?coll=la-news-comment-opinionsHere are several excerpts:
<snip>
Rovism is not simply a function of Rove the political conniver sitting in the counsels of power and making decisions, though he does. No recent presidency has put policy in the service of politics as has Bush's. Because tactics can change institutions, Rovism is much more. It is a philosophy and practice of governing that pervades the administration and even extends to the Republican-controlled Congress. As Robert Berdahl, chancellor of UC
Berkeley, has said of Bush's foreign policy, a subset of Rovism, it constitutes a fundamental change in "the fabric of constitutional government as we have known it in this country."
<snip>
Bush entered office promising to be a "uniter, not a divider." But Rovism is not about uniting. What Rove quickly grasped is that it's easier and more efficacious to exploit the cultural and social divide than to look for common ground. No recent administration has as eagerly played wedge issues - gay marriage, abortion, stem cell research, faith-based initiatives - to keep the nation roiling, in the pure Rovian belief that the president's conservative supporters will always be angrier and more energized than his opponents. Division, then, is not a side effect of policy; in Rovism, it is the purpose of policy.
<snip>
Boiled down, Rovism is government by jihadis in the grip of unshakable self-righteousness -- ironically the force the administration says it is fighting. It imposes rather than proposes. Rovism surreptitiously and profoundly changes our form of government, a government that has been, since its founding by children of the Enlightenment, open, accommodating, moderate and generally reasonable. The idea of the United States as an ironfisted theocracy is terrifying, and it should give everyone pause. This time, it's not
about policy. This time, for the first time, it's about the nature of American government.