What is up with this rumor of a Kerry Story in the WashTimes???

[BUSHOUT]

Check out:
Breaking: Kerry Story on Page One of WashTimes

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/

What is this? Pile of crap or what?

[Name removed]

1. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Nlighten1]

2. Here,,,

Apparently it is "Puppies 2.0"

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/10/24/21359/463

[SoCalDemocrat]

4. Its donations from Iran

Their big smear piece is trying to link Iran to campaign contributions to Kerry.

[Mojambo]

5. The same Iran that endorsed Bush?

Good luck!

[Union Thug]

6. you took the words out of my mouth...

Only days ago, Iran gave bush a glowing endorsement. Hard to explain that little bit of trivia away.

[rocktivity]

7. More word-parsing?

Puppies II: The big Monday morning scoop

About a year ago, Kerry said in a speech that he had met with all the members of the Security Council prior to voting to authorize Bush's Iraq War...The (Moonie-owned Washington) Times piece is going to state that several of the ambassadors on the Security Council allege that Kerry did not, in fact, meet with them.

...That's the Big Story. The one that will knock the wheels off Kerry's campaign. The one that has the Wingnut blogs wetting themselves. The one that will rescue the Bush campaign...

But there is a punchline -- The story is wrong. Kerry did meet with everyone...

Kerry may simply have meant that while he met with all the members of the councils, he didn't meet with all of them at the same time!

By the way, dare I ask what Puppies #1 was about?

:crazy:
rocknation

[ranosgol]

3. Moonie! paper enough said...

[Union Thug]

8. So, if Kerry didn't meet with all members of the security council...

does that mean that george bush never said that he wasn't interested in Osama? I'm so confused!