Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Bush had higher IQ than Kerry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 08:43 AM
Original message
NYT: Bush had higher IQ than Kerry
What the reporter obviously missed is that the person with the high IQ is the person that Bush paid to take the SAT for him.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/24/politics/campaign/24points.html?oref=login&oref=login&oref=login

Secret Weapon for Bush?
By JOHN TIERNEY

Published: October 24, 2004

To Bush-bashers, it may be the most infuriating revelation yet from the military records of the two presidential candidates: the young George W. Bush probably had a higher I.Q. than did the young John Kerry.

That, at least, is the conclusion of Steve Sailer, a conservative columnist at the Web magazine Vdare.com and a veteran student of presidential I.Q.'s. During the last presidential campaign Mr. Sailer estimated from Mr. Bush's SAT score (1206) that his I.Q. was in the mid-120's, about 10 points lower than Al Gore's.

Mr. Kerry's SAT score is not known, but now Mr. Sailer has done a comparison of the intelligence tests in the candidates' military records. They are not formal I.Q. tests, but Mr. Sailer says they are similar enough to make reasonable extrapolations.

Mr. Bush's score on the Air Force Officer Qualifying Test at age 22 again suggests that his I.Q was the mid-120's, putting Mr. Bush in about the 95th percentile of the population, according to Mr. Sailer. Mr. Kerry's I.Q. was about 120, in the 91st percentile, according to Mr. Sailer's extrapolation of his score at age 22 on the Navy Officer Qualification Test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JuniorPlankton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. How scientific and unbiased!
Idiot

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
30. Correction: Bush Higher IQ Than Mariah Carey. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #30
37. Hey!
Don't insult Mariah Carey like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 08:44 AM
Original message
Vdare.com is banned at THE FREE REPUBLIC
It is a bunch of "gentleman" racists who make Pat Buchanan look like Maya Angelou.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. That's interesting
I've never heard of Vdare. I wonder if the NYT reporter is aware of that. Maybe he got suckered by them.

The NYT reporter also quoted this supposed expert:

"Linda Gottfredson, an I.Q. expert at the University of Delaware, called it a creditable analysis said she was not surprised at the results or that so many people had assumed that Mr. Kerry was smarter. "People will often be misled into thinking someone is brighter if he says something complicated they can't understand," Professor Gottfredson said."

Don't know if she is any more credible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progdonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
42. holy shit! check this out...
http://interversity.org/lists/arn-l/archives/Oct2001/msg00615.html

The Pioneer Fund has been involved in the history of race science since its establishment in 1937. One of
its founders, Harry Laughlin wrote a model sterilization law widely used in both the United States and
Europe. Many of the key academic racists in both Right Now! and American Renaissance have been
funded by the Pioneer and the Pioneer was directly involved in funding the parent organization of American Renaissance, the New Century Foundation. Indeed, most of the leading Anglo-American
academic race-scientists of the last several decades have been funded by the Pioneer, including William Shockley, Hans J. Eysenck, Arthur Jensen, Roger Pearson, Richard Lynn, J. Philippe Rushton, R. Travis Osborne, Linda Gottfredson, Robert A. Gordon, Daniel R. Vining, Jr., Michael Levin, and Seymour Itzkoff - all cited in
The Bell Curve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
24. Wow. Sailer is really out there
I just googled it and found this at the Southern Poverty Law Center site:

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?sid=96

"It's radically unfashionable to call homosexuality a disease," Sailer noted this August on VDARE.com (see Keeping America White). But that doesn't stop Sailer, who fashions himself a bold thinker willing to confront taboo subjects.

The personal Web site maintained by the man behind the Human Biodiversity Institute, www.isteve.com, provides a different window into Sailer's way of thinking.

The site is dominated by crude racial and gender stereotypes as Sailer mocks professional golfer Annika Sorenstam for her muscles, claims that Asian men have a hard time finding dates because they look "less masculine" than other men.

Salier also invokes the spirit of his friend Bailey when he claims to have found the real reason Al Gore lost the 2000 presidential election. He chalks it all up to a lisp that makes the former vice president "sound prim, even homosexual."


Why would the NYT quote this guy on anything, much less base a story on his information? This is just incredible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlyvi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. Was this before or after
alcohol and drugs fried his little gray cells?

LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
auburngrad82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. What a total crock of shit
No one can tell me that Bush is even in the top 50 percentile as far as intelligence. I cannot think of a president that was as stupid as this man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. A person can have a high IQ and absolutely no common sense
IQ tests don't really tell you as much as you might think. They help determine strengths and weaknesses, determine special education needs, and determine exceptional aptitudes.

In this case, both candidates scored in the 120s, which is high-average. I scored in the same range. I am willing to say that I would not be a good president, but I would never base that statement on the results of a test I took over 20 years ago when I was in high school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickinSTL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. b/s
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
6. It's as if reality no longer exists
"Mr. Bush's score on the Air Force Officer Qualifying Test at age 22 again suggests that his I.Q was the mid-120's..." (from above)

Really? Then most of those taking the test must have been freakin' Einsteins...

"Bush took the Air Force officer and pilot qualification tests on January 17, 1968. He scored 25%, the lowest possible passing grade on the pilot aptitude portion."

http://democrats.com/display.cfm?id=154

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. Most USAF air crew have IQ's around 120
If Bush* scored in the 25th percentile he most likely fell in the 100-105 range.

I did a lot of IQ testing in the military and later worked on IQ test development - Bush* in no way resembles a man with an IQ exceeding 120.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #15
31. Yes exactly!
The 25th percentile doesn't translate into an IQ in the mid 120's range--this guy is full of crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoSolar Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
7. This is crap.
* is a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philostopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. It ain't the size of the boat you float ...
it's the motion of the ocean.

IQ tests are only a measure of your raw ability to take the test, and your comparison against (what some say are culturally-biased or racist) measures of knowledge.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rogerashton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. "Stupid is as stupid does."
"Buttocks, sir."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JusticeForAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
10. 1206? Is that a valid score?!?
Not when I took the test...scores were in increments of ten. Did ETS have a different scoring system when * cheated on his exam?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. I'm wondering now
if someone pulled a con job on the New York Times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JusticeForAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. I took the test 20 years after * supposedly did
Their standards, scoring and other stuff may have changed...I'll keep an open mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. But the story also claims
that Bush was probably smarter than Kerry and the only source for that is this RW Vdare columnist.

Has anyone ever seen any test scores for Kerry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aden_nak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
29. SATs are graded in incriments of 10. That's correct.
I don't know for certain that it's ALWAYS been that way, though. I would also like to point out that the SAT has a very specific purpose, as stated by ETS (the company that administers it). They claim that it is an indicator of which students will perform the best during their first semester of college. Now for some facts:

1) Students that score highest on the SATs: Older Males

2) Students that perform best in their first semester of college: Younger Females
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
11. I respect Al Gore a great deal...
Edited on Mon Oct-25-04 08:59 AM by w13rd0
...but this is a crock of shit. I'm supposed to be more intelligent than all of them, but I live in a small apartment and scrape by in the Bush economy. Pffft... Ability to "take a test" does not make for wisdom. ON EDIT: My respect for Al Gore has little or nothing to do with the rest of the statement. See, point demonstrated ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
13. I got 1280 - does that mean I can be president?
Woo-hoo! I'm smarter than the most powerful man in the world!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
14. I generally don't trust IQ tests anyway
and this gives me further reason not to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
17. Talk about not living up to your potential
If he didn't pay someone to take the test, Bush is a perfect example of someone who wasted his potential by not bothering to apply himself to anything productive. A high IQ doesn't mean you can't be an aimless, drunken, fratboy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. the best of schools, he didnt take advantage of them
higher iq (on assumptions) and he refuses to think, with pride. to avoid being a fancy pant elitist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
20. Pre-drunk, pre-coke abuse scores don't count anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
21. Old Saying: Use it or Loose it............It Applies to Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
23. Hmmm, let's see...he tried to get into law school,
but his college grades were so poor, they turned him down....even with poppy's influence. Stupid is and stupid does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
25. Would John Tierney jump off the George Washington Bridge...
...if Vdare.com told him too? Talk about gullible!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EndElectoral Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
26. Wow..it was so evident in the First Debate...NOT!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
27. The closer the elections, the deeper the shit.
Bwhahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ekwhite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
28. re: NYT " Bush had a higher IQ than Kerry"
Of course that was BEFORE Bush fried his brain with alcohol and cocaine. Also, keep in mind that you can be a fanatic and still have a high IQ. Trust me, I've met more than a few jerks at Mensa meetings...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
32. I just sent an email to the NYT public editor
Dear Mr. Okrent,

I am writing regarding this story that appeared Sunday on the NYT website:
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/24/politics/campaign/24points.html?oref=login&oref=login&oref=login

The lead item about Bush probably having a higher IQ than John Kerry bases this comment on an analysis by Steve Sailer of Vdare.com, whom Mr. Tierney identifies as a conservative columnist.

Well, it seems that Mr. Sailer is more than that. I direct your attention to the Southern Poverty Law Center's findings that Vdare is a radical and racist organization:
http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?sid=96

The article makes the claim that Bush's IQ was probably higher than Kerry's but offers nothing to back that up other than Mr. Sailer's assertion. No test scores for Kerry are ever quoted.

At the very least, Mr. Tierney should have identified Sailer better than as a "conservative columnist." His radical views should have been noted so that readers can better judge his credibility.

Thank you for your time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opstachuck Donating Member (184 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
33. i don't even think republicans would believe that n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
34. Yea, right, don't believe your eyes and ears.
Edited on Mon Oct-25-04 10:01 AM by mcg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bad Thoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
35. OK, Let's submit both men to psych tests ...
In order to see who has the mental capacity to lead. I have no fear that * will be considered damaged goods, his high IQ lost in a blast of cocaine, his reason clouded by dimentia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Homerr Donating Member (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
36. Bush IQ after years of cocaine abuse? 95.....90......?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
38. They brought up the SATs in the 2000 election.
Newspaper reports at the time said Bush's were slightly higher than Gore's -- and I do remember hearing that Bush's were in the 1200s somewhere -- because I remember being stunned and skeptical.

But now I've been looking at old tapes of interviews with Bush, long before he ran for president, and he didn't seem nearly as stupid then as he is now. I do think something has gone amiss in his brain wiring (booze and drugs?) since he was younger. He may have had some basic smarts at one time, but squandered them on partying and not studying.

He may have taken the tests more than once, too ... I improved my score more than 100 points by taking the SATs again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
real democrat Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
39. Must be another GWB somwehere
If you are referring to "little tree 43".. No way....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
40. Its not the capacity that matters, its the software.
If this is true (I don't think so) the Bush is playing Pong on a Cray X1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
41. Souldn't have even posted this crap - some rightwingers extrapolation?
Gimme a fucking break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. Well, it's already made it halway around the world
So ignore it if you like, but it's getting picked up:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/898432.cms

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
43. If this is true, it is the most conclusive proof that cocaine is the great
equalizer...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC