Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Am I to understand that we will lose at least one of WI, MN, IA and NM?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:17 AM
Original message
Am I to understand that we will lose at least one of WI, MN, IA and NM?
Because that seems to be the word around here. Will we lose one? Which one will it be? Perhaps we'll hang on to all of them? I'm so confused...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lefta Dissenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well,
we're NOT LOSING WISCONSIN! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helpisontheway Donating Member (641 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. People are saying that we are more likely to
lose Iowa and Wisconsin. I think Bush is leading in both right now (not overwhelmingly but I think it has been a trend). HOwever, I think I read something about more dem votes so far with early voting in Iowa. New Mexico was close last time so I'm sure it could go either way. Maybe Richardson will be able to help us. I'm not sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniorPlankton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. We could...
Fear works wonders :(

Shouldn't change the outcome of the election, though.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wisconsin has consistantly polled poorly for Kerry....
so I have to say Wisconsin may be lost.

We should prepare to loose one State because it is possible.

However, we can pick up New Hampshire (4 EV's). We need to do well in Florida, Ohio, Arkansas, Colorado, and Virginia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Sorry, Colorado and Virginia aren't gonna happen.
We've got a better shot in Nevada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. We aren't losing MN either.
Local poll they did recently had 44 pct repugs and 33 pct dems. They will give the results tonight, but I don't expect them to accurate to be honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. Heard some results this morning.
On the right-wing Hubbard station - Rasmussen poll indicates * is up 48-46. Of course when they reported a poll with Kerry having a 5 point lead, they made SURE to mention it was a "statistical tie."

Then I heard about the over-sampling of Republicans. MN, while having elected a couple of Repukes lately, is still solidly Democratic and has far more Democrats than 'pukes.

Bottom line, it's bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
secular_warrior Donating Member (705 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. My gut tells me we'll lose NM and win the other three
but some folks say it looks like MN will actually go over to the dark side this time, as it and the upper midwest in general has been trending Repub over the past few elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. Not MN - don't believe it.
Its "trending Repub" is only due to two snafus:

1) Repukes managed to tar & feather Democrats in 2002 by screaming that we had exploited the Wellstone memorial. They were able to turn the election into a referendum on the memorial rather than about who would be the best senator for MN, and thus we got stuck with the Teeth from Brooklyn.

2) Pawlenty "won" the governorship because a liberal Democrat (Roger Moe) and a conservative Democrat (Tim Penny - running as an Independent) split a majority of the vote. I think Pawlenty only got in the low 40% range, but it was a plurality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. That's just TeeVee crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
9. Oh, no! Nobody will tell you what to think!
Why don't you just keep working & hoping--for now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemPopulist Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
10. Honestly
Edited on Mon Oct-25-04 09:26 AM by DemPopulist
I don't think we necessarily lose any of them. By all rights, given Nader and the overall closeness, we should've lost one of them in 2000 (and probably Oregon too). I suspect the trends favoring Kerry nationwide and reflected in states like Ohio & Florida will push him over in these four as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
11. K/E has two problems in Wisconsin.
1. There is not much of an unemployment problem.

2. The state has very high property taxes and the shrub's whining about Kerry as a tax & spend liberal appears to have some traction there.

However, any state that can re-elect Feingold so easily is clearly winnable by K/E. It's all about turnout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sybylla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Wisconsin will go to Kerry, I'd bet on it
Wisconsin always goes the direction that Madison and Milwaukee go. Madison is very liberal and with Gwen Moore running for the 8th CD in Milwaukee, she'll bring in another 100,000 votes for Kerry easy.

Plus, the polls have been hosed since before Kerry was the candidate. One poll has the Dem ahead, the next has the chimp ahead. That makes them all suspicious. But as an active Dem party member, I have to say that there has been a huge surge of activity here for Dem candidates. We have a very progressive tradition here and I give kudos to Howard Dean for awakening that spirit here again and bringing progressive Dems out of the woodwork. Dems will be out in record numbers this year.

Wisconsin will go to Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. I haven't been to WI or IA, but I've been to MN and NM and it looks
like Kerry Country to me. We'll win NM and MN, and I'll let other more familiar with WI and IA make predictions about those states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
13. I think Iowa might go Bush
But we have Ohio and Florida, which means it doesn't matter.

BTW, the Republicans campaigning in New Mexico recently said that if they don't get a massive turnout there, they are going to lose that state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC