Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Spin on the Explosives - Attack Kerry!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:12 AM
Original message
White House Spin on the Explosives - Attack Kerry!
"As usual, Kerry is basing his attacks on headlines he reads every day."

They ARE NOT denying anything.
They ARE attacking Kerry.

This was just on MSNBC. They are giving this heavy play. Holding up the headlines from NYTimes. Showing clip of Kerry attacking Bush for his "extraordinary failure."

BUSH IS FUCKED!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. you know... the nyt was probably just 'guessing' n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Probably a total surprise for Bush, given he doesn't read the paper n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. This of course contrasts to the guy who *doesn't* read headlines...
...ever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. Duh. Why wouldn't you base your attacks on facts in the news?
:shrug:

Oh, that's right. The WH bases its attacks on Kerry on stuff it makes up. I understand now. Nevermind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
31. My thoughts exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amber dog democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. somehow i think this has to be Clinton's fault
you know a clenis has to be involvied somewhere. Its the source of all evil.

They're screwed. I just wonder how many more will be killed on account of their stupidity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. Ain't that the truth
The Clenis is always involved...whether it be the economy, terra, WMD, job loss, whatever. They are one pathetic little band, the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juliagoolia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. WE need to remind MSNBC and the rest we deserve to know
WHY they let these explosives be left in a situation where they could be looted and kill our kids!!!!!!!!!!!

Why and when did they know? Why did we not know? Who is hiding what?

How many kids have no arm because of this huge mistake..or no legs or no life?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Yes. We don't want this to become just another he said/she said.
We want the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
19. Occam's Razor:
The simplest explanation is always the best.

Q: "WHY they let these explosives be left in a situation where they could be looted and kill our kids"

A: Because they knew the effect that looted explosives would have in such an unstable region, and that was the intended effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. Far simpler:
Gross incompetence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Yep. It never ceases to amaze me
In ALL areas, they are simply incompetent or corrupt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #19
33. A simpler explanation
They were only fixated on the oil, and were deluding themselves into thinking that the Iraqi situation would be stable after Saddam was killed or captured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KC21304 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yes you idiots, Kerry does READ ! Isn't that amazing ?
As opposed to Bush, who gets his talking points fed into his earpiece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GainesT1958 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
8. Well, the recession was (is) all Clinton's fault...
And us being unprepared for the 9/11/2001 attacks was all CLinton's fault, too...

And, DAMMIT, if that Mass LIBERAL, French-lovin' Kerry had voted for the $87 billion for Halliburton, well, then, this never would have happened, would it?!:eyes:

Wonder if Steely Dan's "Pretzel Logic" song was prophetic?:eyes:

B-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonddad Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. I'm not sure about the impact
I think this is a very important story because it demonstrates there was no plan for dealing with a post-war Iraq. The administration knew about this material and did nothing to secure it. That is incredibly important and very scary.

But, in the last week of the election, I think this just highlights what Kerry has been saying about Bush having no plans to win the peace. It merely confirms what Kerry has stated instead of opening up a new line of attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. The final nail in the coffin of the Bush pResidency.
It's important, very important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chelsea Patriot Donating Member (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #12
38. Oh, I'll bet there's more nails yet to come this week.

The fun's just beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
29. Hi bonddad!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
11. Ron Suskind on the Bu$h Regime's "reality" ... (NYTs 10/17)
The (Bush) aide said that guys like me were ''in what we call the reality-based community,'' which he defined as people who ''believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.'' I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. ''That's not the way the world really works anymore,'' he continued. ''We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.''

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=103&topic_id=79184
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. That's a brilliant article!
Just spot on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
giant_robot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
30. That snip could come directly out of 1984 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
13. Kerry has been talking about this for a long time
He even talked about it in the debates and Bush* didn't even respond to it. They are complete and total fuck-ups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
14. A President Who Can READ! What a Concept!
Go Get 'em Senator Kerry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
15. It's bad enuf that bush knew YEARS AGO about that explosives site
The UN has monitored those explosives for YEARS; bush KNEW that. he KNEW those explosives were sitting there unguarded and available to ANYONE when he invaded Iraq.

And after the invasion of Iraq, bush didn't order the site secured.

bush was told a YEAR ago that the explosives were being looted. IF bush had THEN ordered the site secured,a nd then tried to cover up the fact that for a few months he'd left the site unsecured, that would be bad enough.

But it's WORSE;

For that entire year AFTER he'd been told the site was being looted, and right up until LAST WEEKEND, the site was STILL being looted and bush STILL didn't bother ordering the site secured.

bushCartel can attack Kerry all they want; but it's undisputed FACT that bush KNEW about the explosives site and he KNEW about the 150+ muntions sites with 650,000+ tons of munitions and he KNEW they were being looted and HE DID NOTHING.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. From Kerry's official statement:
“The unbelievable incompetence of this president and his administration has put our troops at risk."

Yep. The man who has been strutting around boasting he is keeping Americans safer IS PUTTING OUR TROOPS AT RISK. Cheney told him to guard the oil and puppet-man complied. THESE FUCKERS HAVE GOT TO GO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
16. I'm just surprised that this is TODAY's headline . . .
And not one from June last year.

I was in Iraq at the time and it was common knowledge that there were tens or hundreds of similar dumps (mostly with small arms and ammo) that the Iraqi army had abandoned in place. With the looting going on at the time, local people were driving up to these places and carrying away truckloads of the stuff -- and the very next day these things'd turn up as IEDs or parts of car bombs. Or in the public markets, where the price of an RPG fell to almost nothing.

And what did our military-on-the-ground say at the time? "We don't have enough troops to guard EVERY weapons depot in the country."

This is only news because the news guys have made it news. Which is not to say that I'm unhappy it's getting play now, but the looting of weapons has been going on from day one of the invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. It's been reported constantly in the world media
And even in the US media since May 2003...but only 1/2 of America (the anti-invasion half) paid any attention.

The rest of the world has been screaming about this since May 2003 and it's why every world poll, including the UK and Poland and Italy and Australia (all bush's "best pals") say bush & his invasion have made the world LESS SAFE.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. That's why I don't rely on US media for news.
I'm just glad it's being reported now, before the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #16
32. Welcome To DU
And welcome to the part of the world that knew this was going on and stood in stunned paralyisis as we had no voice to speak out about what we saw going on.

Glad you made it through your time in Iraq and you can share your experiences with us...explaining how things really were and correcting improper perceptions.

Yes, some may suspect the timing...and many of us wish this had come out months ago, but remember the filters that any of the news other than what this regime want out. It was difficult; especially in the war-giddy "Shock & awe" days of the invasion to get a contrary opinion out and it's still fooling too many people.

Our military is so compromised and another 4 years of this regime could create a generation wounded by its own Vietnam. And for what? Filling up an SUV???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #16
36. NOPE. Not just another weapons stash.
350 TONS of high grade explosive. Not your everday weapons stash.

Nice attempt to downplay the event, however.

The reason it is today's headline is that the Bush administration tried to keep it a secret. NOW we learn the truth. If the timimg is unfortunate for Team Bush - IT'S THEIR OWN DAMN FAULT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. No attempt to downplay . . .
Just pointing out that you're just as dead if you're killed by a looted AK-47, a 1-pound roadside bomb made from a grenade and a handful of nails, or 2 pounds of this high-grade stuff going off in the cargo hold of your vacation flight to Cabo San Lucas.

The first two have already happened over and over. How long 'til the third comes true?

And Bush's LYING about it is the story here?

That's very old news.

But maybe people will take notice now?

Well, maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Newsflash: The IEDs being used in Iraq are a lot bigger than 1lb
The IEDs being used to take out Bradleys and tanks are quite a bit larger than 1 lb of HE and a handful of nails. But you knew that didn't you? Once again, you attempt to downplay the value of 380 tons of HE to the insurgents.

I'm an infantryman and I know all about AK-47s killing people. But for some strange reason, the insurgents weapon of choice seems to be large amounts of buried high explosives.

We handed them 380 tons of this stuff. Stop trying to make it sound like a cache of AK-47s. I personally uncovered arms caches as an infantry commander. To sugeest that a small arms cache is like 380 tons of HE is absurd.

And yes, the administration's attempt to keep it quiet is big news. Tough luck for the Bush team, eh??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. OK, let's try it again.
A small IED (said by our EOD expert to be in the range of 1 lb) came within 10 feet of modifying my gait forever. Obviously the ones blowing up Bradleys aren't in that class and I never suggested otherwise.

But here's my point -- while 380 tons of HE is a very big deal, there were perhaps HUNDREDS (at least in the high two figures) of Iraqi armories left unguarded, all of which were probably looted. Once you start talking about thousands of AK-47s and thousands of RPGs and thousands of other small explosives, you're talking about enough death and destruction to be just as worrying as the tons of HE.

In fact, I've long maintained that once you've got enough AK-47s distributed throughout a community, the risk of violent death rivals that of WMDs -- at least in that community.

That having been said I don't think we disagree that this hundreds of tons of HE hell is going to show up somewhere (several somewheres) and a whole bunch of people are going to die because Bush is a brainless fuck. Let's just not downplay death delivered at the retail level just because we're also facing it in bulk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
18. Wow! I'm surprised they aren't blaming Clinton as well...
Considering everything in the past four years has been his fault. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
20. Curses! ...damned reality based opponent
"Wacky Democratic Candidate Reads NYT!"

What, they think Kerry should have witnessed the incident himself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. Kerry should base his attacks on faith, not facts
Kerry should be asking if bush* has any cnnections to the money-changers in the temple.

WHy OH WHY is he asking about Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steely_Dan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
27. And Only 30 Miles from Baghdad
...To make matters worse, the ammo stockpile was less than 30 miles from Baghdad. You mean they couldn't secure an area that close to the supposed "green zone?"

-Paige
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
34. Didn't the US protect the Oil Ministry in Iraq when the invasion
started? Why was that more important than the ammo dump?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
35. Like the AP's headline? Bush: I'm Best Candidate to Protect U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
41. LOL: "Kerry is just showing off that he reads newspapers."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC