DaveSZ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-25-04 10:48 AM
Original message |
If Kerry won New Hampshire, New Mexico, and Colorado, he could win without |
|
Edited on Mon Oct-25-04 10:48 AM by DaveSZ
...Ohio and Florida (273 EVs). Check it out: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/vote2004/politics101/politics101_ecmap.htmlZogby has Kerry ahead in Colorado, but gives Florida and Ohio to *: http://www.electoral-vote.com/That seems odd no?
|
DaveinMD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-25-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message |
|
has long been suspect. Kerry will win OH and maybe FL
|
DaveSZ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-25-04 10:50 AM
Response to Original message |
|
If you give Kerry New Mexico and New Hampshire, and take away Colorado, he can still win with Arkansas.
Electoral-vote.com has Arkansas as a tie right now, and many polls also have it tied.
|
cubsfan forever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-25-04 10:50 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Since AWOL has basically given up in Ohio.
Professor 2
|
DaveSZ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-25-04 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. I think Colorado will eventually be a blue state |
|
Let's hope Salazar wins at least.
|
cubsfan forever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-25-04 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. What do you think the odds |
|
are that CO will only split its EVs if Kerry wins the state? If Chimpy wins (steals) the state, they will fall back on "tradition."
Professor 2
|
dolstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-25-04 10:51 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Trust me, if Kerry wins CO, NM and NH, he's not going to lose OH and FL |
DaveSZ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-25-04 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
fujiyama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-25-04 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
NH is looking very likely regardless, but I think CO will be a tough state to crack. I'm seriously suspicious of Zogby's numbers, for the simple reason that he has Kerry up by 4 in the state. No other poll has shown him with a lead there...On the contrary - Most have Bush up by around that same margin (of 4-5 points).
|
F.Gordon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-25-04 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. Where Zogby may be off (or dead on) ...don't know |
|
Edited on Mon Oct-25-04 11:39 AM by motivated
In the Colorado poll Kerry is leading by HUGE double digit numbers in the 18-34 age range. Over 34 years old the edge goes to bush* in all the age groups, but by single digits. (4%-7%)
Another interesting part of the Zogby poll is the Black Vote. Other polls that show bush* in the lead in Colorado are reporting Blacks voting as high 34% for bush*. Zogby has 100% of Black voters...voting for Kerry.
Also, the polls showing bush* leading are giving the Ind share fairly consistent with the 2000 elections. (this is the 2nd largest voting block in Colorado) Zogby has it bush*: 33% / Kerry 60%
A few more "numbers" from my post in the colorado forum... ================================================ bush* 45.4% / Kerry 49.0% / Other 2.6% / NS 3.1%
Denver Metro Region bush* 41.1% / Kerry 55.5% / Other 1.7% / NS 1.6%
North & West Region bush* 52.2% / Kerry 34.5% / Other 5.5% / NS 7.8%
South & East Region bush* 49.4% / Kerry 46.9% / Other 1.8% / NS 1.9%
By Party: Democrat bush* 8.1% / Kerry 87.0% / Other 2.1% / NS 2.8%
By Party: Republican bush* 90.0% / Kerry 6.0% / Other 1.0% / NS 3.1%
By Party: Independent bush* 32.8% / Kerry 60.3% / Other 3.4% / NS 3.5%
Summarizing a few other key stats....
Kerry is leading in Large and Small City totals and bush* is leading in suburbs and Rural. This is a bit confusing, since I would assume that the lead Kerry has in the "Denver Metro Region" would include suburbs.
Kerry is leading by 3% in "Investor Class" AND by 3% in those that make more than $75,000 per year.
Gender Male: bush* 47.1% / Kerry 47.0%
Gender Female: bush* 43.8% / Kerry 50.8%
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:55 AM
Response to Original message |