Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EXPLOSIVE Spin | Today's Flavor of Kool-Ade

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 04:06 PM
Original message
EXPLOSIVE Spin | Today's Flavor of Kool-Ade
Edited on Mon Oct-25-04 04:23 PM by nostamj
OK. I've heard enough of the spinners now.

The SPIN is IN regarding the 380 tons of explosives.

Hey! It could have been worse!

Yes, BushCo assures us that they have destroyed more explosives than they allowed to be stolen!

Yeah! They only stole enough to bring down 760,000 aircraft, it could have been 7,600,000 aircraft!

And besides, Renhquist has cancer!

So, yeah, it's bad. But, it could be so much worse. We're only bad, not very bad, certainly not disasterous. What if it were 100K tons? It's only hundreds of your children are being blown to bits. If we were really bad, if we were disasterous it could be thousands! (Uh, don't quote me on that.)

Don't you feel safer knowing that you're not in as much danger as you could be if we fucked up even worse? Why do you hate freedom?

Terra terra terra. Boo!

D E S P E R A T I O N
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AIJ Alom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let's not forget we also saved oodles of oil, otherwise gas prices
would be even higher. (thought I say it, before they spew it out!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPEC Donating Member (217 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Top 11 reasons we are safer after Dubya allowed 380 tons of high explosive
Edited on Mon Oct-25-04 04:10 PM by GOPEC
Top 11 reasons we are safer after Dubya allowed 380 tons of high explosives to be looted in Iraq.

11. High volume will drive down prices for the explosives buy-back program.

10. CSI Iraq will determine the precise type and amount of explosive used in every suicide-bombing and when all 380 tons have been used up, we'll strike back with impunity.

9. By making terrorism easy over there, we'll make terrorists too lazy to attack us here.

http://www.toostupidtobepresident.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. this is like their claim to have killed '75%' of the Al Qaeda leadership
except when asked they can't state how many leaders there were to begin with.

Rumsfeld and bush went looking for WMD. They should have at least gone through the motions and secured this stockpile of explosives since it was known to exist and documented by the IAEA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. you'd think, wouldn't ya?
and don't even get me started on the looting of nuclear sites....

and, ironically, they didn't even really secure the oil. too much EXPLOSIVES available maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. bush is inherently, consistently, relentlessly INCOMPETENT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MileHiStealth Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Actually, it's 760,000 aircraft ...
Takes 1 lb. or less to bring down an aircraft ...

2000 x 380 = 760,000

I'm more worried about all the Stinger missiles
we gave them when they were fighting the Russians,
though ... Shoulder fired and pretty accurate ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. thanks.
math was never my subject. made the OP more scary and outrageous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Those were metric tons
So it would be 380 * 2204 = 837,756
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC