Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kennedy on CNN: "We Need John Kerry," Rushing Back to Iowa!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Raya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 02:26 PM
Original message
Kennedy on CNN: "We Need John Kerry," Rushing Back to Iowa!
Edited on Thu Jan-15-04 02:59 PM by Skinner
Ted Kennedy just on CNN strongly backing Kerry and once again dismissing any suggestion that Kerry’s IWR vote meant Kerry wanted war. Kennedy looked like he was bursting with excitement!

“I know John very well” said Kennedy. “I met him on the capitol steps when he came back from Vietnam as a young war hero and testified against the war.”

“I have work with him for 18 years on the Foreign Relations Committee.” Kennedy insisted Kerry is the most knowledgeable and solid of the presidential candidate. “In these times we need a steady hand at the helm. We need John Kerry.”

Smiling at the good new re IOWA polls, Kennedy beamed “We are on fire in IOWA. I am looking forward to getting back there!”

- - - - - -

In the mean time Kerry, rallying his fellow war veterans reaffirms is his peace Activist spirit declaring “There is no glory in war.”

I have noticed that the book on Kerry “Tour of Duty” is by noted historian Douglas Brinkley, and the Movie on Kerry “Brothers in Arms” is a new PBS documentary.

Wouldn’t it be great to have a candidate with truly legitimate life of courage and preparedness to lead to run against Bush.


Article:


Kerry rallies veterans in Waterloo
By ANELIA K. DIMITROVA
Register Staff Writer
01/14/2004
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Waterloo, Ia. –
…..

Backed by four Texas brothers who fought in Vietnam and his former gunner, Gene Thorson of Ames, the senator looked to history for solutions to the problems he said plague the United States today.

Kerry spoke for 15 minutes after a 15-minute clip was shown from the PBS documentary "Brothers in Arms," which features Kerry and other Vietnam soldiers.

Citing his combat experience and the lessons he and the nation learned in Vietnam and other wars, Kerry said the Bush administration has ignored the wisdom of the past and lost its legitimacy in the eyes of the American public and the world.

"We are at war again in ways that defy the lessons of Vietnam," Kerry said.

EDITED BY ADMIN: COPYRIGHT

. . . . . . . . . . . . .


http://desmoinesregister.com/news/stories/c4789004/23252504.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. He would be the first Vietnam Vet elected president.
He's an excellent figure to effect the passing of the torch of our democracy to a new generation of patriots.

“I know John very well” said Kennedy. “I met him on the capitol steps when he came back from Vietnam as a young war hero and testified against the war.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is exciting
The nomination has really turned into a horse race where it is hard to say what might happen. Kerry may even pull out a miraculous come-from-behind win in Iowa. Edwards also has a shot at a surprising second place. And Gephardt and Dean are still right there in the thick of things as well.

Amazing how fortunes can change so quickly.

Go Kerry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. As a Clark supporter I am pleased to see that Kerry is doing so....
well. I was a Kerry supporter before he voted for IWR. I switched to Clark because he opposed the war in Iraq. With these new allegations coming out that he basically supported a war against Iraq, I may have to give John Kerry a second look.

I was GREATLY disappointed to see this information come out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I wouldn't say any of them really supported war.
Except maybe Lieberman. However they did support a resolution that expected full diplomatic measures BEFORE use of force was determined.

Democrats have to open their eyes and stop using IWR as a defining issue. If Bush had implemented IWR the way it was written there would have been no use of force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Kerry supported holding Saddam accountable
He did not support a war in Iraq. He would not have handled the situation the way Bush did and a war would never have happened. Kucinich believed we should make sure and get inspectors back in Iraq too, he just thought we could do it through diplomacy alone. Kerry decided diplomacy alone had gone on long enough and a threat of force was necessary. Decide however you like, but please make your decisions on the actual views of the candidates about Iraq, not just a vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I believe Ted Kennedy said his and Kerry's vote meant the same
Not sure, but I do like Kerry as you know, and I count him as my number 2 choice and I am glad he has made a comeback in Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. Wish we all could put the IWR aside. Clear that lots of good Dems voted y
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iowapeacechief Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Just to complexify things in Iowa...
...we're watching our Sen. Harkin (who reluctantly voted for IWR) campaigning for Dean (who claims he opposed IWR) while Sen. Kennedy (who did vote against IWR) campaigns for Sen. Kerry (who voted just like Harkin). Any litmus left in that test?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. heheh...I hear ya.
While the only REAL antiwar candidate gets ignored by the press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Ain't that the sad truth
People are strange animals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
25. Why are Clark and Kerry competing? They cancel one another it seems
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. Raya
Per DU copyright rules
please post only four
paragraphs from the
news source.


Thank you


DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ted Kennedy trusts John Kerry to lead our country.






Ted knows 'the Real Deal' when he sees it!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Who could deny it! Looks Great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
26. Is it Teddy that creating buzz in the Kerry campaign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. No. Kerry is creating the Buzz. But great to have a "Real Deal" Endorsemen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. I hope
Teddy Kennedy comes to Michigan with Kerry...I'd drive to the U.P. to see that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. Would Kennedy be in Kerry Cabinet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. With as much Senate seniority as he has
I'd bet pretty big the answer is no.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. "a candidate with truly legitimate life of courage"
We already have such a candidate, his name is Wes Clark. Unlike Kerry, Clark did not support IWR and did not choose to remain silent about Paul O'Neill's revelations that Bush planned to attack Iraq long before 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Silent???
Clark's actual position on Iraq is ambiguous, I don't know why people hang their entire view of this war on a vote. What people's actual plans and views were are MUCH more important than a vote. The only candidate who never talked about war in connection with Iraq is Dennis Kucinch.

And this isn't silent on O'Neill:

"Des Moines, Iowa -- “These are very serious charges by a former high ranking Administration official. We already knew the Administration failed to focus on the threat from Osama Bin Laden and Al Queda. We already knew the Administration broke every promise they made to work through the U.N., use the resolution to enforce inspections, build a coalition, and plan for peace. But Secretary O’Neill’s revelations would mean the Administration never intended to even try to keep those promises. It would mean they were dead-set on going to war alone since almost the day they took office and deliberately lied to the American people, Congress, and the world. It would mean that for purely ideological reasons they planned on putting American troops in a shooting gallery occupying an Arab country almost alone. The White House needs to answer these charges truthfully because they threaten to shatter their already damaged credibility as never before.”


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Link to Jan 10 Kerry Response to O'Neill revelations
Edited on Thu Jan-15-04 06:21 PM by emulatorloo
as quoted by sandnsea

http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/releases/pr_2004_0110.html

On edit: better post title
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Thank you
I tend to want to smack people, don't I?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Kerry exposed more government corruption than ANY other
person in modern history. That took courage.

Kerry bucked the corporate fatcats and helped craft the Kyoto Protocol. That took courage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Clark has a legitimate life of courage too
but, like Dean, I think his antiwar stance should be questioned.

It's only the responsible thing to do when candidates make claims about their positions, to ask if they really mean it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. I agree. But I think we need to look pass their words now to what they
have done and said in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George_Bonanza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
22. If Ted Kennedy can "forgive" John Kerry for IWR
Certainly it's good enough for the rest of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. I think it should be overwith, off the table, a non-issue, taboo, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC