Dickie Flatt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-25-04 09:55 PM
Original message |
|
Edited on Mon Oct-25-04 09:58 PM by Dickie Flatt
*
|
whistle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-25-04 09:57 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Someone please tie all these Drudge links together..... |
|
...what Drudge is saying does not deserve all these different threads on DU.
|
CarolynEC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-25-04 09:58 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Good point -- an entire month goes by.... |
|
... before anyone sends some troops over to have a look?
That doesn't say much for the "planning," does it?
|
BadMatt22
(58 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-25-04 09:58 PM
Response to Original message |
3. The Freepers somehow think this helps Bush! |
|
I love it! It's funny in a tragic way...
|
jezebel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-25-04 09:58 PM
Response to Original message |
4. EXACTLY!!!!!! The site should have been secured day 1. It shows Bush |
|
went in without a well thoughtout plan or adequate trooops. He left the site UNSECURED for 3 weeks. That is exactly what Kerry says, he did not secure the weapons immediately.
|
truthpusher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-25-04 09:59 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I agree - if you notice earlier today Drudge wasn't bringing any attention |
|
..to the story. Matter of fact it was off his board!! Now he has a freakin' flashing light attached to the story..Numnut!
|
krkaufman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-25-04 09:59 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Yes, agreed. Aside from the fact that Sludge's "facts"... |
|
... seem to be off. I've heard on the news in the last day that the troops didn't bother checking on these particular weapons, even when they had "taken" the site.
It was a matter of priorities, just as Scotty McClellan says.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:45 PM
Response to Original message |