Old Rense (don't blame me) raised a most important and serious question. What do medically-minded DUers think? It's also a most important question for people to consider BEFORE they vote:
Report - Bush Suffered
A Past 'Seizure'Jeff Rense
4-26-4
If this news story is accurate, the American public is being betrayed (yet again) at the highest level. Americans have a RIGHT TO KNOW if their Commander-in-Chief is even remotely incapacitated. This story, if correct, raises multiple crucial and immediate issues and possibilities which need to be examined and considered. Such as...
1. Did the famous 'pretzel' dive and resulting bruise have anything to do with a 'seizure'?
2. If Bush had one 'seizure' who is to say there won't be (weren't?) more?
3. Could 'seizure' be a polite way of saying TIA or 'mini-stroke'? Such events often leave some measure of damage...depending on which portion of the brain was affected. Further, TIAs, once begun, have a habit of continuing...building up to a major stroke in many cases.
4. Brain strokes are common in cocaine use...especially long-term abuse and smoking of crack.. The President's behavior falls well within the medical boundaries of cocaine stroke.
See:
http://www.drugabuse.gov/NIDA_Notes/NNVol13N3/Cocaine.html CONTINUED...
http://www.rense.com/general52/bsei.htmThis article brings up similar questions, pre-Pretzel and pre-Selection 2000:
George Bush Keeps Changing His Story
Governor Bush's Cocaine ProblemThis article, first published in the summer of 2000, is not about George Bush's drug use. It is about how he dodges, ducks, and hedges when confronted with his past drug use. American citizens deserve a leader who can be frank and honest.by Adam J. Smith
First he refused to confirm or deny it. Later he would say only that "when I was young and irresponsible, I was young and irresponsible." Next he said that the issue wasn't relevant. Then he said that he wouldn't address "rumors." Then he said that he could pass a standard security check dating back seven years. Finally, he said that he could've passed the security check in his father's White House -- fifteen years. Though he had to think before specifying whether he could've passed it then or now. Now, no matter what he says, the issue seems destined to dog him until the day he comes clean.
Texas Governor and Republican presidential frontrunner George W. Bush, Jr. has a cocaine problem.
Under normal circumstances, an individual's past drug use, especially if that use occurred in the distant past, should not be relevant to their qualifications for present employment. But in the race for the United States Presidency, it is relevant on two counts. In fact, in Governor Bush's case, it is relevant on three.
As governor of Texas, George W. Bush, Jr. supported and signed legislation increasing penalties for drug possession in that state. In one instance, Governor Bush signed legislation mandating jail time for people caught with less than a single gram of cocaine. As a candidate, Bush's handling of the cocaine question offers clues as to how he deals with embarrassing mistakes -- admit them and move on, or obfuscate and side-step. As President, Governor Bush would preside over a national drug policy that is increasingly punitive, the driving force behind the nation's ascendancy to the title of world's most prolific incarcerator.
CONTINUED...
http://www.progress.org/archive/drc12.htm