Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does the Market Play Presidential Favorites?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Steelangel Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 02:55 PM
Original message
Does the Market Play Presidential Favorites?
Edited on Tue Oct-26-04 03:20 PM by Steelangel
Many on Wall Street--and on Main Street, for that matter--believe the stock market prefers a Republican president. Oddly enough, however, the S&P 500® Index has posted better returns when a Democrat has held the office than a Republican. Since 1929, the S&P 500® has gained an average of 10.1% during each year of a Democratic administration, yet only 3.8% during Republicans' years in office.

Even excluding the Great Depression, Democrats hold the edge. Since 1945, the "500" has risen 10.7% on average each year under Democrats and 7.6% under Republicans

One reason could be that economic recessions have occurred more frequently during Republican administrations than Democrats'. Since June 1899, there have been 22 recessions--15 (two out of three) beginning while a Republican was president. As the table ablove indicates, when the four-year presidential cycle is broken apart we find the early years to be more challenging than the latter years, particularly for Republicans. Again, this pattern could be the result of recessions coming early in different administrations. I will leave it up to the reader to decide if that is the result of inheriting a predecessor's problems or the new president's own mismanagement.

Should investors infer from this that, statistically speaking, they would be better off under a John Kerry presidency than a second term with President Bush? Or even that the market might soar next year should Kerry be elected? Not necessarily. Even though investors may all too clearly remember the 13% decline suffered by the S&P 500 during President Bush's ("43") first year in office, they may have forgotten that the Index also slumped 11.5% during Jimmy Carter's inaugural year.

More... http://myfidelity.members.fidelity.com/investorsWeekly/enewsfa.jhtml?pageName=LFEAen0410&service=CREM (there are two statistic images, check these out)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Steelangel Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. **kick**
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steelangel Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. **kick**
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steelangel Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. once again, **kick**
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Don't they play long market games ?
Edited on Tue Oct-26-04 03:28 PM by jdots
Having enough money to hedge the bad times for normal people by making money from people being out of work.When the Democrats are in office the slow trend of progress begins
with forsight and invention,the players are there to cash in at the right time.The market is like a bass wave with big gradual nodes.Before the 29 crash the market was frantic with so few players,now it's grown up with mutual funds and huge amounts of brokers,different kinds of inside information.If it was a fast game the concept of it being so safe and conservative wouldn't be there.The shift from fossil fuel will make the computer decade look like a pimple in the market.You can bet it won't happen under the neocons,but the fat cats will be there cashing in and out.Who knows what will happen with the media now,it has grown so huge while being owned by so few.The market is played by brawn instead of brains right now, that changes when the people need new technologys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steelangel Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. **kick**
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steelangel Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. **kick**
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC