Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Al-Qaqaa Spokesman Says No Weapons Search - Suck that freepers (RATE IT)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 08:10 PM
Original message
Al-Qaqaa Spokesman Says No Weapons Search - Suck that freepers (RATE IT)
The first U.S. military unit to reach the Al-Qaqaa military installation after the fall of Baghdad did not have orders to search for the nearly 400 tons of explosives that are missing from the site, the unit spokesman said Tuesday.


When troops from the 101st Airborne Division's 2nd Brigade arrived at the Al-Qaqaa base a day or so after coalition troops seized Baghdad on April 9, 2003, there were already looters throughout the facility, Lt. Col. Fred Wellman, deputy public affairs officer for the unit, told The Associated Press.


The soldiers "secured the area they were in and looked in a limited amount of bunkers to ensure chemical weapons were not present in their area," Wellman wrote in an e-mail message. "Bombs were found but not chemical weapons in that immediate area.


"Orders were not given from higher to search or to secure the facility or to search for HE type munitions, as they (high-explosive weapons) were everywhere in Iraq (news - web sites)," he wrote.

<SNIP>

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=540&u=/ap/iraq_weapons&printer=1


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cubsfan forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Getting harder and harder to spin
their lies, isn't it? The truth shall set US free!

Professor 2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Rated, and kicked, and how could any true American support fraud Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slutticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Read, Rated, and Kicked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Chimp compounds his mistakes.
One mistake creates another, and another, and another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Done n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemsUnited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. done
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bombs were found, but no chemical weapons. Oh, that explains it.
No wonder they just ignored 350 tons of high explosives -- it wasn't on their scavenger hunt list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ciaobox Donating Member (796 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. choke on that freeptard bitches!
Mosh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. excellent

Can we compile more facts into this thread.

For example, inspectors found some material removed early in 2003 before they resealed it. Wash Times and freepers are trying to spin this to mean all the explosives were taken. I recall it was a small amount that was actually moved or taken out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC