Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Freeper meltdown over Civil Union

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AnIndependentTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 08:18 PM
Original message
Freeper meltdown over Civil Union
Edited on Tue Oct-26-04 08:21 PM by AIndependentTexan
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1257188/posts

Bush Says His Party Is Wrong to Oppose Gay Civil Unions
The New York Times ^ | October 26, 2004 | ELISABETH BUMILLER


Posted on 10/26/2004 5:05:21 AM PDT by ruralgal


President Bush said in an interview this past weekend that he disagreed with the Republican Party platform opposing civil unions of same-sex couples and that the matter should be left up to the states.

Mr. Bush has previously said that states should be permitted to allow same-sex unions, even though White House officials have said he would not have endorsed such unions as governor of Texas. But Mr. Bush has never before made a point of so publicly disagreeing with his party's official position on the issue.

In an interview on Sunday with Charles Gibson, an anchor of "Good Morning America" on ABC, Mr. Bush said, "I don't think we should deny people rights to a civil union, a legal arrangement, if that's what a state chooses to do so." ABC, which broadcast part of the interview on Monday, is to broadcast the part about civil unions on Tuesday.

According to an ABC transcript, Mr. Gibson then noted to Mr. Bush that the Republican Party platform opposed civil unions.

"Well, I don't," Mr. Bush replied.

He added: "I view the definition of marriage different from legal arrangements that enable people to have rights. And I strongly believe that marriage ought to be defined as between a union between a man and a woman. Now, having said that, states ought to be able to have the right to pass laws that enable people to be able to have rights like others."

Mr. Gibson then asked, "So the Republican platform on that point, as far as you're concerned, is wrong?"

"Right," Mr. Bush replied.

Mr. Bush announced in February that he supported an amendment to the Constitution that would ban same-sex marriage, and said at the time that the union of a man and a woman was "the most fundamental institution of civilization." He acted under enormous pressure from his conservative supporters, who had lobbied the White House to have the president speak out in an election year on a matter of vital importance to them.

But Mr. Bush also said at the time that states should be permitted to have same-sex civil unions if they chose.

Mr. Bush has sought to walk a careful line between pleasing conservatives who oppose same-sex marriage and not alienating more moderate voters who might see bigotry in his views. Mr. Bush's support for civil unions and his opposition to his party on the issue is in part an effort to reach out to swing voters, whom he needs to win on Nov. 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not sure what to make of this. This is the first I'm hearing about it.

1 posted on 10/26/2004 5:05:22 AM PDT by ruralgal
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't believe this. The NYT is really going full boar trying to smear the President.



5 posted on 10/26/2004 5:08:37 AM PDT by GopherGOPer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Bush has ALWAYS said that this should be left up to the states. Why? Because all states so far oppose civil unions, and have voted against them. That's the reason activist judges are overturning the laws...

He saying let the PEOPLE choose what they want - and since they overwhelmingly want marriages between men and women only, it becomes a enfranchisement issue.



6 posted on 10/26/2004 5:09:14 AM PDT by dandelion
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Taken out of context! He would refuse to sign a civil union law if he were still governor & TX were to pass one. BUT HE BELIEVES STATES HAVE THAT RIGHT IF THEY CHOOSE.

The media is lying, in their sneaky way. But do I expect them to flash a neon warning sign over their lie? HA HA HA! Good one!

NO, WE have to ferret it out for
OURSELVES.



205 posted on 10/26/2004 7:34:24 AM PDT by txrangerette
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Huh? Bush said it. I agree with him.



212 posted on 10/26/2004 9:54:52 AM PDT by conserv13
---------------------------------------------------------------------

exactly right - leave civil unions "alone", because if we bundle them into the gay marriage opposition battle - its a sure loser for our side.



220 posted on 10/26/2004 10:53:32 AM PDT by oceanview
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. They sure do melt down a lot.
They need more and better meds, methinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. the mother of all freeper meltdowns.......
is going to happen next Tuesday.

:party: :party: :party: :party:

:bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Why Don't You Go There As A Poseur
Edited on Tue Oct-26-04 08:21 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
and write that Bush is going to divorce Laura and hook up with Matt Drudge...

You'll get a twofer...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skylarmae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I didn't think the bible thumpers were supposed to do drugs.....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PopSixSquish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Exactly - When Don't the Freepers Meltdown Over Something?
It was amusing at first, now it's just sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. I was about to post the same thing. LOL!
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newscaster Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. flip flop!!!!!!!


:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fucking hypocrites
I wonder if they will be banned. This is from the knuckledragger rule book.

"We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc."

Cmon RimJob, ban them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. FLIP FLOP FLIP FLOP
!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. thank god he didn't come out against incest
half of em would have shot themselves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
captainjack Donating Member (548 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. he's going to mention it once and never revisit it
MARS, anyone? Eliminating the IRS?

the man really doesn't hold to his word...um, EVER.

btw, why are freepers blaming NYT for this? charlie gibson did the interview on ABC! these people have no shame, no sense of reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BUSHOUT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. I don't want to out anyone
but my trolldar was going off reading that freerepulsives thread!

Masterful trolling!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carla in Ca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. What am I missing here?
What happens to the hate amendment? I know it didn't pass earlier but he wants it. Wouldn't that amendment override state's laws?
Where is the outrage from his conservative cronies? Why would he say this now?
I hope this is a HUGE mistake for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cubsfan forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. You mean like all of
his other huge mistakes, right? This is so great watching those pompous morons come apart at the seams.

Professor 2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Keirsey Donating Member (508 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. sort of off topic...
Is love a choice?

Steven Rea's character in "The Crying Game"?

Gates McFadden's character in the Star Trek episode, "The Host"?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cubsfan forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. That's odd,
I was responding to #13, who said it was a huge mistake. Perhaps you didn't read that? And yes, your response was definitely off topic--you know, like: "Will Red Sox sweep the Cards?" or "What is the mean temperature in Antarctica in December." I suggest you read the whole post before responding.

Professor 2

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. Well Charles, I was just POSTURING to the base...momentarily
Credibility?

Integrity?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drscm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. When are they going to learn that *bush's only motivation is political
expediency. I doubt if he has any "moral" convictions at all.

And I'm tired of this "activist judge" crap. They certainly had no problem with the activist judges who unconstitutionally put this idiot in power. After Kerry is elected, I think that they should be impeached as a first order of business for putting our country through this trial.

The second order of business would be bringing DeLay up on ethics charges and, this time, effectively deal with him.

And my list could go on and on and on....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lanparty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
18. Flippity, Floppity ...

Kerry needs to get the flip-flop ads produced and run these in conservative swing states.

Bush's endorsement of civil unions will keep the fauxndamentalists from going to the polls!!!! The Bush flip-flop can help negate some of the old "Kerry flip-flops" stuff in swing voters mind.

Bush's #1 job has ALWAYS been playing to his base. This was their strategy. Now they FUCKED UP. And if Kerry doesn't help Bush undo his own strategum, he's s fool!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC