http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1257188/postsBush Says His Party Is Wrong to Oppose Gay Civil Unions
The New York Times ^ | October 26, 2004 | ELISABETH BUMILLER
Posted on 10/26/2004 5:05:21 AM PDT by ruralgal
President Bush said in an interview this past weekend that he disagreed with the Republican Party platform opposing civil unions of same-sex couples and that the matter should be left up to the states.
Mr. Bush has previously said that states should be permitted to allow same-sex unions, even though White House officials have said he would not have endorsed such unions as governor of Texas. But Mr. Bush has never before made a point of so publicly disagreeing with his party's official position on the issue.
In an interview on Sunday with Charles Gibson, an anchor of "Good Morning America" on ABC, Mr. Bush said, "I don't think we should deny people rights to a civil union, a legal arrangement, if that's what a state chooses to do so." ABC, which broadcast part of the interview on Monday, is to broadcast the part about civil unions on Tuesday.
According to an ABC transcript, Mr. Gibson then noted to Mr. Bush that the Republican Party platform opposed civil unions.
"Well, I don't," Mr. Bush replied.
He added: "I view the definition of marriage different from legal arrangements that enable people to have rights. And I strongly believe that marriage ought to be defined as between a union between a man and a woman. Now, having said that, states ought to be able to have the right to pass laws that enable people to be able to have rights like others."
Mr. Gibson then asked, "So the Republican platform on that point, as far as you're concerned, is wrong?"
"Right," Mr. Bush replied.
Mr. Bush announced in February that he supported an amendment to the Constitution that would ban same-sex marriage, and said at the time that the union of a man and a woman was "the most fundamental institution of civilization." He acted under enormous pressure from his conservative supporters, who had lobbied the White House to have the president speak out in an election year on a matter of vital importance to them.
But Mr. Bush also said at the time that states should be permitted to have same-sex civil unions if they chose.
Mr. Bush has sought to walk a careful line between pleasing conservatives who oppose same-sex marriage and not alienating more moderate voters who might see bigotry in his views. Mr. Bush's support for civil unions and his opposition to his party on the issue is in part an effort to reach out to swing voters, whom he needs to win on Nov. 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not sure what to make of this. This is the first I'm hearing about it.
1 posted on 10/26/2004 5:05:22 AM PDT by ruralgal
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't believe this. The NYT is really going full boar trying to smear the President.
5 posted on 10/26/2004 5:08:37 AM PDT by GopherGOPer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Bush has ALWAYS said that this should be left up to the states. Why? Because all states so far oppose civil unions, and have voted against them. That's the reason activist judges are overturning the laws...
He saying let the PEOPLE choose what they want - and since they overwhelmingly want marriages between men and women only, it becomes a enfranchisement issue.
6 posted on 10/26/2004 5:09:14 AM PDT by dandelion
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Taken out of context! He would refuse to sign a civil union law if he were still governor & TX were to pass one. BUT HE BELIEVES STATES HAVE THAT RIGHT IF THEY CHOOSE.
The media is lying, in their sneaky way. But do I expect them to flash a neon warning sign over their lie? HA HA HA! Good one!
NO, WE have to ferret it out for
OURSELVES.
205 posted on 10/26/2004 7:34:24 AM PDT by txrangerette
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Huh? Bush said it. I agree with him.
212 posted on 10/26/2004 9:54:52 AM PDT by conserv13
---------------------------------------------------------------------
exactly right - leave civil unions "alone", because if we bundle them into the gay marriage opposition battle - its a sure loser for our side.
220 posted on 10/26/2004 10:53:32 AM PDT by oceanview