Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Josh Marshall suggests Pentagon might be sticking it to bush.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 02:39 AM
Original message
Josh Marshall suggests Pentagon might be sticking it to bush.
This evening, Wingerdom is all aflutter about what they now see as the New York Times-CBS-IAEA international anti-Bush conspiracy. But they might do better to focus their anxieties elsewhere.

Like at the Pentagon, for instance.

Who over there is trying to stick it to the president?

Look at two big news stories on Tuesday, the Washington Post report that the White House plans to ask for some $70 billion more in Iraq spending just a week or two after the election and this USA Today piece reporting that the Pentagon is planning to add roughly 20,000 more troops to the force in Iraq in anticipation of the elections in January.
<snip>

Don't get me wrong: I'm not saying that the Army is trying to drive the president from office or that there's anything coordinated about this. I'm simply pointing out that if you look at the Pentagon as a whole -- and not just Larry Di Rita's shop in OSD -- in Bush-Cheney '04 terms, it's starting to look like part of the problem rather than part of the solution.

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2004_10_24.php#003809
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Traveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. We're done
I am speculating based on the statements of former colleagues and what I have read in specialized public sources that the brotherhood is done with the neo-conservative maniacs.

We sometimes get out of hand, but our basic impulse is to protect the nation and tend to its best interests. We bow to civilian rule ... but when that rule refuses to accept reason and reality, or when its purposes are dishonorable, all bets are off.

Consider the American military very centrist, and you won't be far wrong. Bush is a fuckin' radical, and that in the long run will produce increasing friction between the military and the political branches of government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Congratulations on 1 year here at DU robg!
and thanks for your insight here! It's nice to know Kerry has his share of support in the Pentagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThePhilosopher04 Donating Member (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. After viewing Rumsfeld's War on Frontline tonight...
I'm inclined to agree with Josh Marshall. We often assume the military is in lock-step with this administration but I'm beginning to think they have more enemies than friends!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I remember hearing that the Navy was none to friendly either
When the Swiftee business was in full swing, I was impressed by the little tidbits of support I'd see coming out of official publications like the Navy Times -- a document here ... an investigation that cleared Kerry's medals there. I appreciated the hell out of that.

In other news, is it true that Bush want to cut the Navy fleet down? Thought I heard that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
giant_robot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. Great Frontiline last night
and I have to agree that this administration does not have many friends in the Pentagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. Military might be pissed at bush for using them as scapegoats for Iraq
being FUBAR. bush constantly says he gives the military whatever they say they need to get the job done (don't blame me, I just write the checks!). And if what they say they need isn't what he wants them to say they need, he gets someone else who will say it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Florida_Geek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. they hate Rummy more than Bush
Bush would have been better served firing Rummy.....IMHO

Only the Air fArce with their super dupper missle defense and planes like Bush.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humanbeing Donating Member (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 03:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. A military acquaintance told me tonight...
"I know first hand that they have to scrounge up folks to go to the speeches (Bush) gives on military posts. Usually have to order folks."

WOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. I have always learned it this way.
If anything gets in the way of the big money boys, as a president hurting their pockets, they would step in and take the guy down any way they could. Now that is said with the belief of big international money really being the power behind every thing. I think it is true and I think Bush is starting to hurt the golden goose which is the buying power of the rich countries. So things are starting to turn a little stinky for him. He has to be a front man who does what is best for them. Which is really good for working middle class world wide, as we keep the money people in big money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. The military
gets it back up when you start forcing retirements for general officers that you don't like them politically. Truman caught a lot of military flack over McArthur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
9. kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
11. They're pissed because they got "Vietnamed" again
Idiot monkeys trying to start and run a politically motivated war, ignoring real intelligence, cooking the intelligence, putting troops in harms way for no good reason. It all blows back on the military and they are obviously pissed.

It started when the idiots FIRED the general who gave them reality based advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boredtodeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. It's the 9/11 Commission legislation
Edited on Wed Oct-27-04 09:39 AM by Boredtodeath
The White House and the Pentagon are at odds over the legislation from the 9/11 commission.

Bush wants to take away military control over intelligence. That pissed off the Pentagon.

The House is supporting the Pentagon, Bush and the Senate the separation.

It's all about the 9/11 Commission legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC