&^^%$#!! Don't let them get away with this!

[baltodemvet]

In a recent mass e-mail, Ed Gillespie the chairman of the RNC wrote:

"Senator Kerry and the New York Times leave the impression that ... U.S. troops were derilict in their duty to guard the stockpile"

http://www.nationalreview.com/kerry/kerry200410262047.asp

:grr: NO. Kerry was clear that it is the BUSH ADMINISTRATION that was derelict--not U.S. troops.

[Hello_Kitty]

1. How can they be derelict in a duty that wasn't ordered?

Lying bastard!!! :grr:

[ClintonTyree]

2. The "responsibility" administration strikes again..........

in essence THEY'RE transferring blame to the troops. These bozos won't admit to anything. Everything they do is perfect, no mistakes. They're totally blind to reality.
Then they spread lies like this and expect people to swallow them. The jig is up assholes, people aren't buying your bullshit anymore.

[bluestateguy]

3. If they were derelict it is the Administration's responsibility

Or the responsibility of their commanding officers, not the rank and file troops.

[sendero]

4. If there is a hell for lying sacks of shit...

... the Republican spinmeisters must have box seats :)

[nytemare]

5. This is just like the Swift Boat attacks...

saying that Kerry in his 1971 testimony to the Senate Foreign relations committee "accused" the soldiers in vietnam of war crimes. His whole testimony was placing the blame on the Nixon/Johnson administrations for putting the soldiers in those situations.

Even when you look at Abu Ghraib, what responsibility for that has this administration taken? None, even with a memo publised by the Washington Post that placed the responsibility for that right at the White House doorstep. They still say it was the "acts of a few bad apples."

"The WHO" talked about this one time..."the men who spurred us on, sit in judgement of all wrong".

[mzmolly]

6. Passing the f*cking buck again huh? My Gawd, this is gonna backfire

on their sorry asses.

[acmavm]

7. Ed has some serious problems with the truth and the English language.

He's either a pathological liar or severely retarded, ethically and mentally. I actually say it's a combination of all of the above.

People like this have no business in public life. Liars like this should never be allowed to influence how our government is run and who represents the American people as President.

This is the amazing part, lying and liars have become so acceptable nowdays. In the past, just being caught at lying like is done now would have had such a negative impact that the person caught doing it would have been seen as having been disgraced (an old fashioned word), and he would have had to run away with his tail tucked between his legs and retire from public life.

This is the true legacy of Lee Atwater and KKKarl Rove. They have made the dishonest and corrupt acceptable in our political system. Maybe not acceptable to us, but to the Republican party. And that's is what is truly wrong with out political system now.