Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush is NUTS landing at Lancaster (KLNS)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
byronm Donating Member (376 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 07:17 AM
Original message
Bush is NUTS landing at Lancaster (KLNS)
I fly out of this airprot all the time - and i know sore sure the runway isn't safe for a 757 (Airforce 1) to land & takeoff on without closing nearby roads and causing a scene and putting people at risk.

Bush is supposedly landing AF1 on this runway:

imensions: 5398 x 150 ft. / 1645 x 46 m
Surface: asphalt/grooved, in good condition
Weight limitations: Single wheel: 65000 lbs
Double wheel: 92000 lbs
Double tandem: 146000 lbs


5398 feet long and only 150 feet wide and weight limit of 146,000 lbs...

I know the military has done touch and goes with large turbo-props but this has to be the worst..

I mean the typical empty weight of a 757 is 148,000 lbs and the typical runway at sea level empty weight with no fuel and luggae is over 4,100 feet.

Do we really need crazy stunts to get re-elected?

Do we really need Presidents ruining runways by landing way over gross?

Do we really have to shutdown entire towns for propoganda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Drifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. I thought AF1 was a 747
Edited on Wed Oct-27-04 07:21 AM by Drifter
and has been for a while.

On Edit: link
http://people.howstuffworks.com/air-force-one.htm

Cheers
Drifter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
byronm Donating Member (376 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. No way a 747 could land at KLNS
that would crush the runway just sitting there..

I make dents on the runway landing a cessna 172 sometimes :) can't imagine a 757 yet alone a 747!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. October Surprise? . . . (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. If you're Bush...
... the answer is yes. AF1 pretty much mashed up a similar runway at the local Las Cruces, NM airport, too, recently.

Send the bill for repairs to the White House, and then just wait for a check....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why would they do this?
Is it even safe?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. The USAF has several smaller VIP aircraft...
Edited on Wed Oct-27-04 07:26 AM by alg0912
...not to mention Marine One. I wouldn't worry about (or hope for) it...;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
byronm Donating Member (376 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Its been slated as a 757.. they're noting it as the largest
aircraft to ever land in amish country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. A 757 landing on a 5000 ft strip isn't unheard of...
...however, the pilots will have to stand on the brakes and hit thrust-reverse upon landing to get her stopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
byronm Donating Member (376 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. I guess its really "Airforce II" but still plenty big enough..
AFII is a 757..

i was hoping the pres would be smart enough to land at harrisburg and chopper in - a little less risky and costly in repairs and closure of airport..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Any fixed-wing aircraft the POTUS is abourd becomes AF1...
...even if he's in a Cessna 150 - it's the standard ATC callsign. AF2 is Cheney's aircraft callsign.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
24. Actually, ANY aircraft, fixed-wing or rotor if it belongs to the Air Force
If it's a Marine aircraft, Marine One.

Private or commercial aircraft, Executive One.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. Air Force One isn't a 757, it's a 747
Do they have a smaller Air Force One for this kind of thing, or are they using the Air Force One he's been campaigning in for the last four years?

Add to your numbers that Air Force One is heavier than a regular 747.

I've been at airports that 747s worked alongside smaller heavies, and the difference is astounding--the smaller planes will go about halfway down the runway then take off, while the 747s need almost the whole thing. Unless Air Force One has JATO units, they might have to take the plane apart to get it out, or they'll just roll it off to the side and turn it into a Monument to Hubris.

When the Big Dog came to Fort Drum, where Wheeler-Sack Army Airfield doesn't have a runway big enough to land a 747, they flew him to a major airport in the 747 then transferred him to a DC-9 for the trip to Fort Drum. Bush would have landed the 747 at Drum then whined about not being able to get home in time for warm milk and cookies and Unka Dick reading him a bedtime story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Air Force 1 is whatever Air Force plane the President's on at the time.
Yes, he usually uses a 747 in "Air Force One" livery, but "1" os the designation for the President. Thus:

Air Force One is any Air Force aircraft the President's on.

Marine One (usually a helo) is whatever Marine aircraft the President's on.

Executive One is whatever commercial aircraft the President's on.

Air Force Two (etc.) is the designator for the VP.

Air Force One Foxtrot (etc.) is the First Lady.

Air Force Two Foxtrot (etc.) is the wife of the VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Florida_Geek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
12. CORRECTION:
Edited on Wed Oct-27-04 07:34 AM by Florida_Geek
If Bush is in a Air Force Piper Club. It is Air Force 1. I would bet my paycheck the "call sign" of the Navy plane he did the carrier landing on was Navy 1.

The President of the United States aways flys Air Force/Marine/Navy 1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Hehehe, great minds think alike :) - see my reply below n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Florida_Geek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
13. No the Air Force pilot that allowed that is NUTS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
14. Just as a point of clarification . . .
ANY aircraft the President is on that is operated by the Airforce is called Airforce One for the time it is used for such a purpose.

Just as any aircraft (traditionally a helicopter) operated by the USMC is Marine One.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diplomats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. I live in Lancaster and the newspaper said tonight that it was
indeed a 757, the largest plane to land at the airport in 55 years. There were massive road closings, etc., around the airport, snarling traffic for commuters this morning. (Hope that made some people mad enough to vote for Kerry!)

Needless to say, I was nowhere the place today.

Incidently, hasn't Ron Reagan been terrific discussing the missing explosives today? He repeatedly says that it doesn't matter if the weapons disappeared before or after our troups were there. He was on the early Hardball and the special one at 9:00. He held his own with a Bush supporter on the earlier show. Go Ron!:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. If you are correct on that airport weight limit of 146k ...
Then that was perhaps, exceeded, by my best estimate:

Operating empty with P&W engines 57,840kg (127,520lb), with RB211s 57,975kg (127,810lb). Basic max takeoff 99,790kg (220,000lb), medium range MTOW 108,860kg (240,000lb), extended range MTOW 115,665kg (255,000lb) or 115,895kg (255,550lb).

http://www.airliners.net/info/stats.main?id=101

It all depends on the fuel load. That runway length is not a problem for either a light B-747 or B-757. I watched AF-1 (B-747) land at Providence, RI, with Clinton on board with a 27-knot tailwind. I couldn't believe it. All Boeing aircraft that I have flown, and most airlines, have a 10-knot tailwind limitation on landings.

I have landed a Boeing 737-400 on 5000 feet with a stiff crosswind (Pasco, Wa, if my memory serves me). Not fun. Not for amateurs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
20. but but but.......* HAD to land there to get a photo op with Amish people!
Everybody has to sacrifice. There's a war on!

/sarcasm off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
21. Same goes for the USS Abraham Lincoln stunt
I disagreed with it not because it was pure politics and I knew it would come back to bite him in the ass but because he is the holder of the OFFICE of the Presidency-there have been those before him and, hopefully, those after him. Now I have learned that it was a slow flying plane and very safe* but the President should not take that risk.

*-the pilot who flew him on board died in Iraq a couple of months ago. Sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. *-the pilot who flew him on board died in Iraq a couple of months ago. Sad
That's interesting.

I'm not suggesting anything. It's just that he might have known something about what * did or didn't do while supposedly "flying" that plane, and maybe....

Never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebellious Republican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
22. Temperature and runway construction materials factor in as well
I used to fly on board P3 Orion's, not exactly a 757, but still pretty heavy. When you factor in the weight of a full crew, on board computers, ordinance so on and so forth.

We once landed at an airfield in Peru in the middle of summer, it was an extremely hot day, man did we leave some ruts in the asphalt.

It was like glue, probably sub standard construction anyway, however my point is, depending on the construction materials and temperature as to how much damage can occur.

My guess is that they factored this in and are fairly certain that it would be safe.










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 15th 2024, 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC