jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 04:01 PM
Original message |
WaPo Tracking - 49 Kerry / 48 Chimp |
Bush was AWOL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 04:02 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Good news! 3 days in a row with a Kerry lead |
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 04:03 PM
Response to Original message |
2. could bush flatline at 48? |
flpoljunkie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Some pollsters are saying just this--Bush seems to be stuck at 47-48%. |
|
How this trend continues! However, we cannot afford to let up, as these polls are all pretty much within the margin of error!
John Kerry is absolutely right when he says "the only poll that counts is the one on election day."
GOTV!
|
lancdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if he gets |
|
Edited on Wed Oct-27-04 04:11 PM by lancdem
46 or 47 percent, because incumbents often do end up a couple points under what they're polling.
|
sonicx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 04:03 PM
Response to Original message |
tedoll78
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 04:06 PM
Response to Original message |
|
the polls in 2000 consistently underestimated Dem turnout. In 39 of the last 43 national polls, it was Bush who was leading. Now, we have ties or narrow Kerry leads, with the odd Bush lead once in a while.. all within the margin of error. If the pollsters want to keep underestimating us, that's fine. We'll just work even harder than we did in 2000.. and blow them all away.
|
jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 04:08 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Best news is that Kerry maintained a lead, even with Sunday's 3 pt gain |
tritsofme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. Sunday doesn't drop off until |
jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. Are you sure? Maybe i'm not reading things right. |
|
Aren't these numbers from 27-26-25, with 24th dropping off?
|
tritsofme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
16. Now after looking at it |
|
I think this poll might be a 4 day rolling average, meaning Sunday doesn't roll off until Friday's poll comes out.
See post 12.
|
tritsofme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 04:08 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Sunday was one of Kerry's big days |
|
It will be interesting to see if it holds up after it rolls off tomorrow.
|
jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. Look above - Great minds think alike or there are no original thoughts!? |
|
I'll go with the latter. LOL!
Yep, let's hope the MO stays with us.
|
Donny247
(184 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
Saturday, which was Kerry's highest single-day track, has dropped off the total. Sunday was also good, but the fact that we're still ahead is encouraging. It probably means we're at rough parity with Bush.
|
jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
19. Thanks. I was confusing the report date with the field date. |
tritsofme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 04:13 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Wait is WaPo now a 4 day rolling average?? |
|
The latest tracking result represents the four-night average of data collected by telephone Oct 23 - 26 among a randomly selected national sample of 2,412 adults, including 2,107 self-identified registered voters and 1,709 likely votershttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/2004tracking/track102704.htmlI thought they were a three day average....that means that Saturday and Sunday are both still in this result...
|
Dalvis
(90 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A9363-2004Oct5.htmlThis tracking poll is based on a rolling three-day sample. About 350 likely voters are polled each day.
|
tritsofme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
17. 2 conflicting links from WaPo |
jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
15. OK. A four day rolling average. Was thinking what was reported on Sun- |
|
(i.e. the 3 pt Kerry gain) would fall off since it was a three day rolling.
Either way, things are looking good. Tomorrow will tell us more.
|
sonicx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-27-04 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
18. they changed resently, i think |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:31 AM
Response to Original message |