Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Generalized heads up re: Satellite Photos of al Qaqaa

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 07:40 PM
Original message
Generalized heads up re: Satellite Photos of al Qaqaa
At some point the pentagon is likely to release satellite photos of trucks carting material from the facility at al Qaqaa shortly before the US invasion.

That vast complex was among the largest weapons depots in Iraq, so of course a LOT of trucks were hauling a LOT of stuff from there before the invasion. That's what you do before getting invaded... you go get your weapons out of storage. There were artillery shells and rockets and all sorts of other stuff kept there.

That obvious set of facts has 0.00% bearing on the question of RDX/HMX under IAEA seal at al Qaqaa.

Showing trucks leaving al Qaqaa and saying they must be carrying the IAEA monitored RDX/HMX is like producing a security camera picture of a random person leaving a shopping mall to "prove" that Sears is sold out of washing machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skylarmae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. the 3rd ID knows it was there April 3rd I believe. Sorry!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. The issue is "Where are the dangerous explosives"
If they can;t answer that, then they don't have shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nor would the photos address the "bottom line" pointed out today...
... by Senator Kerry: we didn't send enough troops to inspect and secure the ammo dumps. Bush failed to plan for the most basic contingencies or to address the core reason we supposedly invaded, securing Saddam's weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Problem with that is.. this was one of the original wmd plants Saddam
had. If you were looking for wmd's wouldn't you check the facility out where they would have been made before? The IAEA was monitoring all the explosive material since 1991, and had been there 5 days before the invasion. It was all intact, and they had reported the locations of these materials to Bush and his admin. Why was this not immediately guarded after the invasion? That is a question that isn't going away. They have no answer for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC