jezebel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-28-04 10:46 AM
Original message |
Is there any way that the media can ignore the explosives video? Could |
|
they just not show it? I am anxious to see BREAKING NEWS
|
GeorgeBushytail
(862 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-28-04 10:48 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Stressed out cats are more important, I guess.
|
Randi_Listener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-28-04 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
alittlelark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-28-04 10:48 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I hate to sound ignorant, but I don't know what video |
|
you are refering to - could you post a link?
|
almostallhere
(124 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-28-04 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. look at the home page, the story under Rudy G. |
Jersey Devil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-28-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
Nomad559
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-28-04 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. Direct link to streaming video |
alittlelark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-28-04 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
Goldmund
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-28-04 10:48 AM
Response to Original message |
3. No way can they ignore it |
|
Since the Dem campaign, the bloggers, etc will jump right on it -- IF it's a credible video, which it seems to be. Since it's so powerful -- it'll shut Bush right up, I think they're waiting till they can confirm that everything's legit before they unleash it.
Josh Marshall hasn't even mentioned it yet.
|
jezebel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-28-04 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Do the bloggers know yet? NT |
HootieMcBoob
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-28-04 11:00 AM
Response to Original message |
10. They've ignored it completely so far |
|
I've been flipping back and forth between CNN and MSNBC and there hasn't been a peep.
|
ClintonTyree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-28-04 11:03 AM
Response to Original message |
11. They could say that it's................. |
|
inconclusive. Al QaaQa is a HUGE installation. They might not use it because they can't be sure what particular buildings they're looking at. However, if the reporter and troops would verify that NONE of the buildings were already opened, then we've got them by the short hairs. That should be clarified before this story goes forward in my opinion. I hate to rain on anybody's parade here, but this must be verified before any network would go near it. Remember CBS.
|
alittlelark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-28-04 11:08 AM
Response to Original message |
12. Wow... that stations has a major scoop! |
priapis
(155 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-28-04 11:09 AM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:20 PM
Response to Original message |