MoonRiver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-28-04 05:25 PM
Original message |
Question - Why did Team * get rid of his image in photoshopped pic? |
|
I don't understand? Does anybody else? Usually they try to plaster his picture all over the place! :shrug:
|
dogtag
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-28-04 05:27 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I'm not sure that I'm buying that the 'podium' shot is |
|
really an original. Something about it doesn't look right either.
|
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-28-04 05:29 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The falsity, hypocrisy and stupidity of the picture was getting jammed pas a certain circularly-ordered muscle group they have, and it just stopped being fun.
Shorter Version: They have started flinching.
|
MoonRiver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-28-04 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
These people are losing it.
|
ThoughtCriminal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-28-04 05:31 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Only explanation I have is that lying, faking, and deception are first nature, so they doctored it out of habit.
|
No Mandate Here.
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-28-04 05:31 PM
Response to Original message |
5. If the original photo was real, AND |
|
... it was from a campaign appearance, then using service people in uniform in this context is just a little bit illegal. (sarcasm)
That being said, he had a couple people in uniform next to him on a podium the other day, and did not get called on it. He probably took that as approval to break yet another federal law.
|
MoonRiver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-28-04 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. So, its hard to say what is more second nature to the thugs, |
|
exploitation or lying. FIVE MORE DAYS, and counting. :mad:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:03 PM
Response to Original message |