Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Look out Ohio....new VOTER SUPRESSION STRATEGY

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 09:52 PM
Original message
Look out Ohio....new VOTER SUPRESSION STRATEGY
This is from the NewDonkey site....

The Rove M.O.

The latest political news from Ohio is important and instructive. A federal judge in Columbus blocked Republican efforts to force county election boards to review tens of thousands of new voter registrations. Before the ink was dry on the judge's order, the Ohio GOP's top lawyer said the action meant the GOP would challenge such voters at the polls on November 2. "We wanted to have all these questions resolved this week," said attorney Mark Weaver. "Now they won't be resolved until Tuesday, when all of these people are trying to vote. It can't help but create chaos, longer lines and frustration."

In other words, the GOP is using the demise of one prong of its voter supression strategy to pre-justify the other. And I wouldn't be surprised if that's exactly the way they planned it. Now they can can get their "volunteers" out to "create chaos, longer lines and frustration" in minority polling places and sadly say that an "activist judge" who didn't care about voter fraud left them no choice. It's going to get worse, too: mark my words, when Democrats, civil rights attorneys, and voters themselves get visibly angry about this gambit, the GOPers will start whining about "potential violence" at the polls, and even pretend their goons are being intimidated and harassed. If nothing else, it will give them an excuse to go to court to contest Ohio's outcome if the state goes for Kerry.

Now I have no direct evidence that Karl Rove has planned and is executing this voter suppression strategy, though it's interesting that every Republican hack and pundit in the universe started singing like a cicada about "voter fraud" about a week before the Ohio story got into the national news. But it sure as hell fits Rove's M.O. like a glove.

The Florida debacle of 2000 illustrated two Rove tactics that are devilishly effective:

1) Getting in front of media interpretation of a controversy in a way that reshapes public perceptions of the actual event, and sticking with the spin come hell or high water. In retrospect, the war for Florida was half-won the day after the election, when the Bush campaign (knowing Katherine Harris would give the spin official sanction as soon as she could) announced it had won the state, and then began a relentless and ultimately successful campaign to depict efforts to get a full and accurate count as an attempt to reverse the outcome.

more at the NewDonkey...

http://www.newdonkey.com/2004/10/rove-mo.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cubsfan forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ohio is too far in Kerry's column for it to work,
but yes, they will be their nasty, dirty, fascist selves all the same. GOTV

Professor 2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Hopefully you're right...
it sure sounds like Rove is planning on pulling out all the stops in Ohio....and, I would also imagine in the rest of the battleground states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. They think they're in front?
Come out with a voter warning. Do it on TV. Buy the airtime.

<tt>WE have the votes. THEY have to keep us from voting. That's their entire strategy. The lines will be long. The challenges rude and insulting. But nothing is more important than our vote.

If they keep us from voting, they win. That's the only way they CAN win.</tt>

Identify their strategy up front for what it is.

When they frame an argument, CAGE them in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Mosh
And that's all I've got to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. If they challenge too many voters, the poll workers
can make them stop for disrupting the voting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is an untested strategy, they hope they can cause chaos
but since there really isn't massive fraud they won't have much success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bush equals idiot Donating Member (757 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. There are going to be
a thousand or more independent monitors. They will be looking for hotspots just like that. They will be all over it with their people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George_S Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. RICO ACT
Today, RICO is almost never applied to the Mafia. Instead, it is applied to individuals, businesses, political protest groups, and terrorist organizations. In short, a RICO claim can arise in almost any context.

The purpose of this website is to simplify this very complicated area of the law and to articulate and make more predictable the legal standards that govern such claims.

http://www.ricoact.com/

Since they are the "law and order" party, why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC