Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The question is EASY to answer ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
lanparty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 11:59 AM
Original message
The question is EASY to answer ...

Yes, the press conference was a bunch of hot air. The 380 tons only applied to the HMX and RMX material. This guy says he took out plastic explosives, detonating cord, TNT, and Phosophorous. He filed his report and it was CLASSIFIED!!!!

The facility was NOT being guarded while he was carrying out his operation. He did not encounter ANY IAEA seals at all broken or unbroken. From what I gathered MAjor Pearson cannot even identify HMX and RDX.

What is AMAZING about the report is seeing the scope and size of the Al-Qaqa facility!!!! It's probably as big as a large university campus!!! And there were likely THOUSANDS of tons of various materials stored there. So they can get away with saying they pulled out materials and destroyed them.

And BTW, Major Peason said he used the SOME of the plastic explosives from Al-Qaqa to destroy ordinace from OTHER sites!!!! He said the rest was presumably destroyed in a fire!!!!

The "special assistant" to Rumsferato talked a nice game about "not knowing" and "ongoing investigation". The matter is simple. There are classified reports that will ID what came out of Al-Aqa. All the Pentagon has to do is check those reports and hopefully declassify them!!!!

This story is STILL alive. I was VERY pleased to see the reporters at the press conference grew a spine. They pointed out that Maj Pearson didn't address the RDX and RMX that was the source of the concern!!!! And the MSNBC commentators ALSO saw right through this smoke and mirrors operation.

The verdict is still clear. The troops were NOT concerned about the site because the civilian Pentagon leadership DID NOT make securing those weapons caches a priority!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Press conference was a total bust
That's how they're reporting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Those "known unkowns" again. drat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aden_nak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. The past few years have made the Bush Administration soft and weak.
They are so used to the press rolling over on command that they don't prepare like they should. When you are going to lie on national television about 380 tons of dangerous explosives falling into the hands of people who are killing American soldiers, you had better have your shit together. But it's been so long since they faced any hard questions from the press, they didn't bother to prep.

And now it showed. Big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC