Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would US have to inform IAEA or D. Kay if moved explosives?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bad Thoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:03 PM
Original message
Would US have to inform IAEA or D. Kay if moved explosives?
I think that this is a reasonable question to ask. Kay hunted down all the evidence of a weapons program--he should know if anything had been moved and destroyed, even stuff that could be used for building WMD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why do you think the US wanted the IAEA out of Iraq?
Let these explosives go unprotected and slip into enemy hands and perpetuate the war and increase the profits for the military-industrial complex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bad Thoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. What about Kay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Kay wasn't in Iraq once the inspectors were pulled out
As part of the ISG, they were tasked to find the WMDs, which, obviously, they didn't find any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bad Thoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. This is my point
David Kay, the administration's weapons inspector in Iraq, would have been given all evidence for WMD that he could so that he could make the strongest case for the administration theat Saddam had them or was trying to make them. Even if the weapons were destoyed before Kay arrived, the administration would have saved some evidence (a video tape, perhaps) to give to Kay so that he could place it in his report. If Kay did not know that the explosives had been either moved or destroyed than I doubt that the US ever took possession of them. Kay is the key and he should be asked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrbassman03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I REALLY doubt that the military would do anything to give weapons...
to the enemy. It seems to me to be gross negligence on the part of *-co. You think they have a greater chance at reelection if more soldiers die?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Does leaving weapon unsecured and for the taking constitute giving?
Because that is what apparently happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's a bit conspiratorial but, it's a result of the way the war was waged
They had no plan to secure such facilities, begin reconstruction, prevent looting, rebuild an army, build a police force, etc.

All the plan was to do was to win the invasion. The ideologues truly believed that Iraq would magically turn into U.S., Jr. Instead, as a result of their gross negligence and incompetence, it's about to turn into Iran, Jr.

A result of that will be a virtual perpetual war with terrorists and insurgents in Iraq for years to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC