Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Democrat(ic) talking point

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:44 PM
Original message
New Democrat(ic) talking point
OBL says, "we were able to accomplish more than we planned because the Bush administration did not act to protect its own people!"

How the Hell is the good for Shrub?!?! I do not understand the spin that this is good for that dunce! It should be obvious to the most inbred freeper...SHRUB feel down on the job...he couldn't protect us on 9-11 and he CANNOT protect us now!!! Are they really that stupid to think that Shrub is good for this country?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pelagius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. For what its worth, Freepers...
...are in the same sort of tizzy over the bin Laden tape as some DUers are. They don't see it as good for Bush, but think it constitutes a UBL "endorsement" of Kerry, which will backfire on Kerry. Wheels within wheels over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I am so confused
I do not see how the man who orchestrated the largest attack on our country saying our current president FAILED to protect us is an endorsement for Kerry...it is that damn truth! Shrub failed us then, and, if given (or steals) another 4 years, he will NOT protect us! It seems to me that the man who attacked us is NOT afraid of Shrub, nor does he think he can protect us....this means we are sitting ducks with that dunce in the office!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peachhead22 Donating Member (798 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. How long?
How long was it between the WTC attacks and the Pentagon attack? About a hour IIRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think it was an hour
But in the tape, OBL says the Shrub misAdministration gave his people the extra time to do more damage!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC