pabloseb
(510 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-04 08:42 PM
Original message |
Summary of polls at RCP: Kerry wins |
|
This is the average of polls in key battleground states from realclearpolitics.com (right wing site but quite complete in terms of polls):
• Florida: Bush + 2.2 • Ohio: Kerry +2.0 • Pennsylvania: Kerry +2.4 • Wisconsin: Kerry +0.3 • Iowa: Bush + 1.3 • Minnesota: Kerry +1.7 • Michigan: Kerry +3.2 • New Mexico: Bush + 3.3 • New Hampshire: Kerry +2.7
Assuming that all the other states have the same result as in 2000, Kerry would win the EC with 272 electoral votes. And this is before taking into account the undecideds, the huge turnout especially among the young and minorities, etc.
:bounce: :bounce:
|
pabloseb
(510 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-04 08:44 PM
Response to Original message |
polmaven
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-04 09:01 PM
Response to Original message |
2. We're not going to start believing |
|
realclearpolitics just because they are currently in our favor, are we?
They were just a tad wrong in 2000 when they said Bush would have 446 EV to Gore's 92.......Ummmm........We need a little balance here.
|
pabloseb
(510 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-04 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. I'm just quoting their poll averages |
|
They do take into account more polls that any other site. The fact that the editors are right-wing is not relevant.
Their predictions on who will win are a whole another matter. Although this year they're not predicting any kind of landslide.
|
polmaven
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-04 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Just don't get too excited about it. |
|
This particular site is not a good one to count on.
|
endnote
(645 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-04 09:03 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Polls are BS. Polls WITHOUT MOE information are plain stupid. |
jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-04 09:20 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I so want to feel good about this but recall RCP's 2000 projection |
shockingelk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-04 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. if they're off my as much |
|
and in the same direction, it will be a Kerry landslide.
|
foo_bar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-04 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
The media's fantasy of Bush winning the popular vote and losing the electoral college is not going happen.
|
sundancekid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-04 10:21 PM
Response to Original message |
7. trouble is that averaging usually assures that a measure goes to the MOE, |
|
and your table does exactly that ... the MOE in all these states is around +/- 4 ... therefore, NOTHING can be concluded in any credible sense
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-04 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
the more polls you have the less your margin of error...
If you have four polls asking the same question of 1,000 people each your moe is about 1%
if you have one poll your moe is about 3.9%...
It's late or I'd give a fuller explanation...
|
sundancekid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-04 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. I appreciate your point (see formula below) BUT it assumes the same method |
|
for selecting the sample (i.e. registered v. likely voters, %mix of R's, D's etc..) and the various polls used to average do not have identical criteria; my point was metaphoric rather than mathematical ... and when one averages apples and oranges and bananas, what you get is?????
Note: usual formula is 1/(.04)squared = a sample size of 625 for a +/- 4% MOE; therefore, for approximately a 4000 person sample size, working the formula backwards it would = 1/(.0158)squared, thus producing a 1.58% MOE -- and that decrease assumes identical methodology used on all 4000 persons in the sample, which we do not have here.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:41 PM
Response to Original message |