Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush loss on Tuesday ends the Bush "dynasty"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Paragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 12:48 AM
Original message
Bush loss on Tuesday ends the Bush "dynasty"
Somehow, I don't think the RNC will be very quick to back a Jeb (or even P.) run at the White House in the future...

A third possible Bush lame-duck President? Not even the most diehard freep can get behind that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Carrion Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Don't be so sure....
Just be happy for the pending end of Bush II.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Oh, I'm sure.
Back another loser? The money is never again going to flow into Bush coffers the way it has.

Even a gambling addict knows a bad hand when they see one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wouldn't bet the farm on that one! Remember Nixon!
Edited on Sat Oct-30-04 12:56 AM by napi21
I figured when he lost to Kennedy he would never have come back, but there he was, and he won comfortably.
I don't think Jeb is any different in phylosophy that Shrub, but he's a lot more articulate, and actually makes sense when he speaks!

I remember seeing Jeb on TV in 2000, and although I detest the Bushes, I said Jeb was the one that should have been running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. napi21, I agree with you somewhat. But, I have a question...
Wouldn't it be bad for Jeb to run for President after the disenfranchisment of African American voters in Florida in 2000? I was just wondering...I don't know if people would vote for him, seems like they wouldn't trust him either? :shrug:






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. I can only depend on what I've heard. Jeb was overwhelmingly
re-elected in Fa. in 2002, I think. That to me means that either a lot of his oposers didn't bother to vote, or he still maintains a lot of popularity in Fl.

I would have thought the same as you, but it didn't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carpetbagger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Jeb said he's not running in 2008.
Sure, he can change his mind, but he wouldn't have said it as unequivocally as he did if he was going to run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. but I have to suspect that election was fixed
It's true that Jeb has the support of the big-business crooks who run Florida but I don't think that election was entirely legitimate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. Generally speaking 2002 is a very bad example.
Because he was riding on his brother's "success". :eyes: Many Republicans were "elected" and "re-elected" because they were looking tough on terror and they were successfully playing on people's fears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. Clinton dealt with scandals while in office.
Bush will have to deal with them after leaving. Like most Democrats I'm not in a pardoning mood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. True.
So many investigations have been put on hold to avoid looking "partisan".

Think Kerry will pardon Bush like Ford did Nixon? ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. WHYwould/should he??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. It was a rhetorical question.
I was kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
23. Kerry would.
He's all about class and I have no doubt he will protect Bush. I guess I'm not as gracious. If it were me I would give Bush the "Clinton treatment". I'd say "let the rule of law prevail" and throw his ass to the wolves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. Romanov
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. One can only hope so ....
I'm also thinking about the old farts that have served with repugs for way too many decades: Rumsfeld, Cheney etc. They will be finished once and for all as well. Hallelujah!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. "The Cheney Curse"
Every administration he has worked for has been a lame duck.

He was in the private sector during the Reagan years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. Very Well Put!!
The time has come to drive a stake into that dark heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neomonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
13. Oh sadly I disagree
We will be haunted by the Reign of Bush's for a long time yet.

Remember Halloween when Michael Myers kept coming back from the dead. You thought the movie was over then suddenly, in the corner of the screen, he rose again!

That's how I feel about the Bush monarchy in this country.

We get rid of Shrub, but there is another Bushturd waiting in line to usurp the Oval Office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
despairing optimist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
14. The Fly, The Return of the Fly, The Revenge of the Fly, The Curse of the
Fly. The hits just keep on coming. Keep the (environmentally safe) bug spray handy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
16. Let's hope it ends
Reminds me of when the first Bush was in and I had a "Bush Sucks" bumper sticker. Simple, yet said it all.
Anyway, after Clinton came in I would get asked when I was going to remove it. Since Bush was out, it didn't make sense to keep it on.
My reply was always "He's got sons, doesn't he?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RafterMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
17. Nah, they're going to be popping up like Romanovs
Constant vigillance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Well, there is a solution to that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
22. It ain't necessarily so. Think cockroaches with money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-04 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
24. Fool me once, uh...
shame on you

Fool me, uh, can't get fooled again!

Fool me three times? No f**king way.


And by "me" I mean the American Public. (I don't want anyone thinking I voted for the idiot!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC