dzoner
(52 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-04 01:46 AM
Original message |
| Bush better on "Terror"??? |
|
Edited on Sat Oct-30-04 01:48 AM by dzoner
Just watched Ken Melhman again 3 times in 5 mins, while never answering the ? of why Bush let OBL get away in the mountains, respond with the statement "the vast majority of Americans favor Bush to run the "War on Terror" whatever that is. Now the country seem pretty evenly divided between JK and Bush. Does anyone know someone who is for Kerry and still thinks Bush would make him/her feel safer?
|
| blackcat77
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-04 01:49 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. I think that "common knowledge"... |
|
...that the people prefer Bush to Kerry on terror might be wrong. If this tape affects things at all -- which I really doubt -- then the effect will be minimal.
|
| aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-04 01:49 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Bush IS better at causing terror. Ask the Iraqis. |
|
The man has a skill. Don't belittle it. He's kept us terrified for three years.
Come on, he's not good for much. Give him that.
|
| dzoner
(52 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-04 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Possibly 100K of them can't even be terrorized any more.
|
| darkism
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-04 01:56 AM
Response to Original message |
|
* is better on terror....orising the public and the world.
|
| EmperorHasNoClothes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-04 02:01 AM
Response to Original message |
|
it was only true before Al QaQaa and the OBL tape. Now sentiment has no doubt turned (even) more in JK's favor.
|
| dzoner
(52 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-04 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
Edited on Sat Oct-30-04 02:13 AM by dzoner
Why don't he Dem's do there own polls and use them to dispute this. Over and over in that George Goebbels like way the Bushites spout that fact and the panel Dem. either ignores this or says the gap is narrowing but has facts to prove it.
|
| goodwalt
(199 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-04 02:07 AM
Response to Original message |
| 6. To Take a Page From Mahr... |
|
New Rule: If you can't properly pronounce something, you can't be considered an expert about it.
|
| foo_bar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-04 02:56 AM
Response to Original message |
| regnaD kciN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-04 05:14 AM
Response to Original message |
| 9. Of course, Bush is better on terror... |
|
Edited on Sat Oct-30-04 05:15 AM by JDWalley
...after all, he terrifies me!
:scared:
Oh, you mean better at fighting terror. Sorry, I can't figure that out either.
;-)
|
| Sperk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-04 08:25 AM
Response to Original message |
| 10. * is much better on terror |
|
he's one of the scariest terrorists I know!
|
| liberal N proud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-04 08:28 AM
Response to Original message |
| 11. Bush has terroized more people than Osama! |
| Sinnerman
(323 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-04 09:49 AM
Response to Original message |
| 12. Clinton Even Better than Bush on Terror |
|
Edited on Sat Oct-30-04 09:50 AM by Sinnerman
And no US casualties on Clinton Watch
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:15 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
