|
Freepers put Party/Candidate above what is best for America. I have always wondered why. Recently I attempted to research their type of behavior.
The following are excerpts from my research. Please add your thoughts.
They are nationalists placing their group or unit beyond good and evil and recognizing no other duty than that of advancing its interests. No nationalist ever thinks, talks, or writes about anything except the superiority of his own power unit.
It is difficult if not impossible for any nationalist to conceal his allegiance. The smallest slur upon his own unit, or any implied praise of a rival organization, fills him with uneasiness which he can relieve only by making some sharp retort. It makes it possible for him/her to be more vulgar, more silly, more malignant, more dishonest.
Actions are held to be good or bad, not on their own merits, but according to who does them, and there is almost no kind of outrage -- torture, imprisonment without trial, forgery, lies, deceit, the bombing of civilians -- which does not change its moral color when it is committed by "our" side.
The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them or denying that they ever occurred.
A known fact may be so unbearable that it is habitually pushed aside and not allowed to enter into logical processes, or on the other hand it may enter into every calculation and yet never be admitted as a fact, even in one's own mind.
They have an indifference to objective truth. One prod to the nerve of nationalism, and the intellectual decencies can vanish and the plainest facts can be denied. Most facts are grossly obvious if one's emotions do not happen to be involved: but to the nationalist they are intolerable, and so they have to be denied, and false theories constructed upon their denial.
The point is that as soon as fear, hatred, jealousy and power worship are involved, the sense of reality becomes unhinged. And the sense of right and wrong becomes unhinged also.
There is no crime, absolutely none, that cannot be condoned when "our" side commits it. Even if one does not deny that the crime has happened, even if one knows that it is exactly the same crime as one has condemned in some other case, even if one admits in an intellectual sense that it is unjustified -- still one cannot feel that it is wrong. Loyalty is involved, and so pity ceases to function.
|