BamaLefty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-31-04 11:10 AM
Original message |
|
http://electoral-vote.comWith New Hampshire and Nevada tied. (Two states I think we will win)
|
flowomo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-31-04 11:12 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I'm happy, but the site contains this warning, too: |
|
"...the lead has changed in five states, and all five changes favor Kerry. As a result, Kerry has now passed Bush in the electoral college. If today's results are the final results Wednesday morning, John Kerry will be elected as the 44th President of the United States, with 283 votes in the electoral college to George Bush's 246. But don't count on it. Many of Kerry's leads are razor thin. Counting only the strong + weak states, Bush leads 229 to 196, with 113 electoral votes in the tossup category Kerry's leads in the tossup states mean little to nothing. The turnout Tuesday will determine who wins."
Keep Working!
|
BamaLefty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-31-04 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
I want to win Ohio... FL will be red I am afraid.
|
goodboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-31-04 11:14 AM
Response to Original message |
2. wasn't Ohio "barely bush" the other day? |
|
I'm working hard (hahaha) here in Ohio.
|
Fed Up
(443 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-31-04 11:15 AM
Response to Original message |
4. this website isn't worth the computer monitor it's displayed on. |
|
Well maybe it's worth 1% of an expensive one.
I take it with a grain of salt, maybe a box of salt.
Some "predictor." A predictor isn't something that changes every hour.
|
ydya
(215 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-31-04 11:18 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Why is california showing up as weak-Pro Kerry and not strong? |
|
Is there an extra push we need to start in CA? I hope people turn out in large numbers in CA; if they do, I gotta believe Kerry will win CA easily.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:18 AM
Response to Original message |