Early on I thought the guy was right on, because of his strong showing in the last election, but I know for a fact now his polls are skewed. How do I know? Simple: Zogby Interactive polls are online, with only a 2 percent sample actually followed up on by phone to verify their autheticity, and I've answered each of his polls multiple times with multiple emails (including ohio and Arizona, 2 states in which I do not live) and if I've done it just to see if it could be done, you KNOW there are multiple freepers out there purposely skewing the result, causing the Zogby polls to be such a huge outlier from the norm.
Ask yourself if you truly believe this: Bush is up 50-44 in a 4 day rolling average when kerry has spent FAR more money and time AND has had the state trending his way for weeks? HAH! I've got a bridge...
Edit: My fault for not giving proof at the beginning:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/9/17/145012/521 (Zogby first says he doesn't do telephone polling, which I read before, then admits he still gets a representative sample using telephone polling -- I missed that before)
http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-battleground04.html(Read "METHODOLOGY" and note that it says, and I quote, "Polls through October 19 were conducted online only...")
Incidentally, that latest Zogby map is more proof than ever that his polls aren't correct. If they ARE, not only are we in much deeper trouble than anyone suspects, but he will be the ONLY one to get it right this year, as he has Bush up in Michigan by two, NM by SIX, and MN by one, and even PA is tied! Does anyone beside me just find these numbers not fitting with the overall picture? I love Zogby, and don't want to shrug off these polls because they don't fit what I'm seeing everywhere else, but... help me out here. Something is amiss.