Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Luntz on poll average:AWOL two points lower than he was this point in 2000

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-04 06:11 PM
Original message
Luntz on poll average:AWOL two points lower than he was this point in 2000
It's all over but the cryin for AWOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-04 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. in more ways than yuo can count them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nycmjkfan Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-04 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Did he mention
what the difference was between Gore and Kerry as far as the polling?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-04 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. yes, Bush had a 2 point higher average in 00
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-04 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. He knows it's over. I've seen photos
of him in private moments, candid shots thru a window at the WH, and he looks pissed. Even in some speeches, he seems bitter.

Some people have posted that Poppy knew the weekend before election day that it was all over. So Bush must know now.

Of course, his greasy backers have just spent $1 billion on their boy, so he has to keep up a good image.

I hope all that money spent causes them financial problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-04 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Is Luntz trying to be all "non partisan" now?
Thanks for the info, but Luntz makes me :shudder:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. Great number to cite
never mind the off the radar numbers making it WORSE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC