Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FOX & FRIENDS pos's are claiming the translation from the OBL tape left

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jezebel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 06:12 AM
Original message
FOX & FRIENDS pos's are claiming the translation from the OBL tape left
out that any "state" that votes for Kerry is fine, but the "states" that vote for Bush will incur harm.

They are so full of shit, they are trying to stir up people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. What they omitted was Osama's address to Bush...
I believe it was something to the effect of, "Can you hear me now? Can you hear me now"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RafterMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm not sure what conclusion people are supposed to draw
Edited on Mon Nov-01-04 06:18 AM by RafterMan
As with the tape itself, it seems to just reinforce entrenched positions.

I'd really, really, really, really like to know if it was actually on the tape, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jezebel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I found it on the freepers site. It's from the NY Post. They are lying
about the quote. They had some Middle East group say the tape said "Your security is up to you, and any state that does not toy with our security automatically guarantees its own security." No mention of Bush or Kerry there, they are totally reaching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. They are actually literally interpreting 'state' as one of the 50 states?
I thought the wacked out OBL was talking nations, you know those sort of states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Pretty sure that "state" = "nation"
Your security is not in the hands of Kerry or Bush or al-Qaida. Your security is in your own hands and each state which does not harm our security will remain safe.

Draw your own conclusions. Here's the rest:

http://www.worldpress.org/Americas/1964.cfm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. I posted some info in DU media re this - repeated below:
MEMRI (Middle East Media Research Institute)lies again in NY Post for Bush


Remember the Guardian’s Brian Whitaker taking MEMRI’s president to task for mistranslating a question that included an implied criticism of Israel. The question was "How do you deal with the Jews who are besieging al-Aqsa and are scattered around it?" But MEMRI translated this as: "How do you feel about the Jews?"

sigh... They are at it again....

http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/33124.htm

Monster's Deadly Warning to 'Red' States
by Niles Lathem

November 1, 2004 -- WASHINGTON - Osama bin Laden warned in his October Surprise video that he will be closely monitoring the state-by-state election returns in tomorrow's presidential race — and will spare any state that votes against President Bush from being attacked, according to a new analysis of his statement. <snip>

The statement in question is when bin Laden said on the tape: "Your security is up to you, and any state that does not toy with our security automatically guarantees its own security." <snip>

For those who have forgotten the right wing nature of this beast and its "Hudson Institute" connections:

The two founders, Meyrav Wurmser and Yigal Carmon, are right-wing Zionists. Carmon is the longtime president, while Wurmer left her position as executive director at MEMRI in early 2002 to direct the Center of Middle East Studies at the Hudson Institute. (2) Steven Stalinsky has been MEMRI’s executive director since Wurmser’s departure. Oliver Revell serves without compensation as a member of MEMRI’s board of directors, together with Carmon and Stalinsky

Carmon is a reserve colonel in the Israeli Defense Forces, having served in the IDF/Intelligence Branch from 1968 to 1988. In that capacity, Carmon, who was born in Romania, was Acting Head of the Civil Administration in the West Bank from 1977 to 1982. He served as counterterrorism adviser to premiers Shamir and Menachem Begin from 1988 to 1993. In 1991 and 1992 Carmon was a senior member of the Israeli Delegation to peace negotiations with Syria in Madrid and Washington. (4)

Wurmser, an Israeli-born analyst of Middle East affairs, received her Ph.D. from George Washington University in Washington, D.C. where she wrote on Jabotinsky and the Revisionist Movement. According to Arab Media Watch, Jabotinsky “brokered the marriage between Zionism and fascism.” Wurmser, who has taught at Johns Hopkins University and the United States Naval Academy, and her husband David Wurmser are central figures in the right-wing’s web of Middle East policy institutes. According to the Hudson Institute, “Through her work at MEMRI helped to educate policymakers about the Palestinian Authority two-track approach to 'negotiating peace' with Israel: calling for peace in the English press and with western policymakers while inciting hatred and violence through official Arab language media." Before joining the Bush II administration as a State Department policy adviser under John Bolton, her husband David Wurmser was an AEI scholar and associate of the Middle East Forum (MEF).

sigh......

:-)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Yeah... STATE = NATION.
Get a dictionary, Freeps!!

24.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoBlue Donating Member (930 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. Anyone know the Arabic definition of state?
I sincerely doubt it is the same as the usual American version.

Welcome to the Ship of Fools, Fox and Friends. Methinks you are sinking fast. Splat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marew Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. Fox is worse than ever this AM
Turned on Fox briefly this morning. They seem even more angry and hostile. Nasty Kerry comments. Actually repeated that state nonsense. One person even said that state usually refers to country but they got away from that quickly. Hopefully it's desperation on their part. A New York Post reporter was on speculating that Giuliani might be in Bushies new cabinet. Powell, Condi, and Ashcroft may go. Went to Tampa Kerry Rally last night. It was GREAT. Kerry has more concern for our country in his fingernail clippings that criminal Bush has in his whole ugly body. Of course there were some idiot Bushies outside making fools of themselves and screaming when people were coming and going. Volunteered to be a poll watcher here in Pinellas County (St. Pete-Clearwater) tomorrow. They'll call today if they need me. We can't handle four more years of that freak Bush and the rest of his thugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jezebel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Now they have one of their CIA pundits on claiming OBL is frightened of *
because Bush knows the "art of war" and if Kerry get's elected OBL will be happy because he can go back to business as usual.

I hate them, I really do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. Only the foxhounds would think Arabic "state" = US "state"
What ignorant putzes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. let them speak. what this implies is that bush didn't capture his arch-
enemy! that's about all for bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
13. That one might hurt Repugs. I think Repug crazies would LIKE to see Osama
Edited on Mon Nov-01-04 09:11 AM by w4rma
blow up a whole bunch more Democrats like he did on 911. Just like Repug crazies LOVED to see Osama (and every other two-bit terrorist) on our TVs spreading their terrorist messages with America's full attention.

I think they think another big bombing in a blue state would turn states into Repukes states. I think that's partially why they could really care less about capturing or killing Osama and went after Saddam, instead.

Repugs just aren't concerned about Osama terroism because they know that out in rural areas their chances of being blown to smithereens is slim to none, while Democrats, whose strongholds are often large population centers are alot more likely to be targets and in the Repuke quest for more power, they are more than happy to let Democrats be targets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC