Plaid Adder
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 08:03 AM
Original message |
Outstanding Top 10 "list" Today, EarlG! |
|
Thanks for busting your ass to do that every week. Everyone give it up for EarlG! Then onward to battle! YAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!
C ya,
The Plaid Adder
|
benito
(772 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 08:26 AM
Response to Original message |
1. This week was especially incredible! |
|
So much idiocy that O'Reilly didn't even need to make an appearance!
|
lalajohns
(67 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. Top 10 is my *favorite* on DU |
SemiCharmedQuark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 08:27 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Great list, I never knew who did it before. |
|
Seriously, your blood pressure must be horrible having to sift through so much crap all week. I think mine goes up fifteen points just reading what you've skimmed off the crap heap.
|
Plaid Adder
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 01:34 PM
Response to Original message |
Spazito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 01:37 PM
Response to Original message |
|
It was through EarlG's Top Ten list that I found DU and your choices are always right on! Thanks again!
|
Goldmund
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message |
|
It's one of my top 3 favorite columns.
This week especially -- the conservatives worked hard to overwhelm EarlG with their idiocy and fry his brain server, but EarlG withstood the flood and churned out yet another excellent expose of the fascinating phenenomenon we call Conservative Idiocy.
Right on.
|
Canuckistanian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 01:43 PM
Response to Original message |
|
It's just not Monday without TTL!
|
chiburb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 02:07 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Kick for a GREAT TOP TEN!!!!! |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 11:25 AM
Response to Original message |