unfrigginreal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 12:06 PM
Original message |
More Fox Poll - Early voters Kerry 48% Bush 43% |
|
Edited on Mon Nov-01-04 12:07 PM by unfrigginreal
Mike McCurry says that of 3mil early votes in 12 battleground states(unnamed) Kerry leads by 6.25%
|
deadparrot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 12:07 PM
Response to Original message |
1. That's a bit of a discrepancy |
|
with the other numbers showing * ahead, isn't it?
|
GreenPartyVoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. But perhaps early voters are more likely to vote dem on acct of voter |
sonicx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
other polls of early voters included red states like Texas. this is battleground only i guess.
|
JuniorPlankton
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
we don't know for sure if the early voters are representative of the total.
But I sure count on it!
:)
:kick:
|
progressivebydesign
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. What other numbers showing Bush ahead?? |
|
I haven't seen any lately.
|
deadparrot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. It was in a CBS article. |
|
* was in the low 50s (51%, maybe), and Kerry was in the low-to-mid forties.
|
DeminDC
(118 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Bush is ahead in early voting in the national sample, which makes sense because most blue states do not have early voting. However, McCurry is referring to the battlegrounds, so he has separated out the South Dakotas and Alabamas of the country.
|
Oreo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 12:09 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Especially while I'm watching Outfoxed for the first time!
I think they're probably boosting *'s numbers though. Bastards
|
NewYorkerfromMass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 12:09 PM
Response to Original message |
7. I really don't see how "early" numbers will be much different tomorrow |
|
I don't see statistically how they should be any different. Statisticians please weigh in...
|
rjbny62
(203 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 01:31 PM
Response to Original message |
10. this is the beginning of the huge turnout of the UNLIKELY's |
|
that will generate a big win for Kerry and allow everyone to get to bed early tomorrow night
|
central scrutinizer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 01:36 PM
Response to Original message |
|
what is known about the missing 9 percent? Did they refuse to answer and if so, is there any evidence to think they will split in a similar proportion? Are they voting for third parties or not voting or all? Tin foil hat time: Is this a Rovian plot - spread the word to Repugs to refuse to answer to make us overconfident and not work as hard on the GOTV efforts?
|
dolstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. 9% don't know who they voted for? |
Dems Will Win
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. No, they did not vote in a protest against Bush |
|
Same thing happened in Florida (K 56%, Bush 39%) and in Iowa (JK 52% and Bush 41%).
This 4% or 5% falloff of republican voters plus the extra 4% of Rs converting to Kerry (6% Rs to JK, 2% Ds to Bush), explains all the early voting.
In Iowa for example, the 52 JK and 41 Bush would work out to a final poll of JK 54, Bush 44, with third-parties the rest--if it holds up on Election Day.
After that 60 minutes report on Iraq, I'm sure it will hold up.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:44 PM
Response to Original message |