Paragon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-17-04 03:24 AM
Original message |
Poll question: How accurate is the polling in Iowa? |
Crunchy Frog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-17-04 04:19 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Probably about as worthwhile |
|
as reading goat entrails. The only numbers that matter are the actual ones that emerge from the caucus.
|
Awsi Dooger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-17-04 04:20 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Not accurate, and I've put money on it |
|
My friend and I bet each other on the percentages. I took the greater dispersion from poll indications in virtually every instance. Zogby state polls are notoriously unreliable, along with the caucus aspect and the general unlikelihood of four candidates with such even support.
Actually, I'm just giving my friend a chance to get even. Before the NBA season he bet me the Lakers would never lose two in a row. Too bad GW won't topple that easily.
|
maddezmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-17-04 06:47 AM
Response to Original message |
3. we'll know on Tuesday :) |
tinanator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-17-04 09:11 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Sat Jan-17-04 09:13 AM by tinanator
Dude, you got me cryin by postin that pic. not cool. how about a quote instead? His latest release is AWESOME! Really, you threw me for a loop with that. Maybe MLK jr's would be more appropriate right now. Wear a rifle pendant or something. RIP Bill. -in fact, why dont you save me the trouble of transcribing his perfectly appropriate bit on polls from his latest release? I have been meaning to do it myself, but way to busy.
|
Padraig18
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-17-04 09:16 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Wildy inaccurate, IMO. |
|
I believe the race is tightening, but I don't believe it's as tight as the pollsters say it is. Monday will either prove me right, or wrong. :)
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 02:45 PM
Response to Original message |