Sandpiper
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:01 PM
Original message |
When Kerry wins, who will be the next Chief Justice? |
|
It looks like Mr. Chief Justice Rehnquist's reign is about to come to an end, one way or another, which means we'll be needing a new CJ.
My prediction for the next Chief Justice after Kerry wins on Tuesday is David Souter. He's a member of the liberal wing of the court, is only 65 so he should have plenty of years left, and he was a Bush 41 appointee, which would make it tougher for the Pubbies to oppose him.
As much as I'd like to see Ruth Bader Ginsburg become the first female Chief Justice, given her history with colon cancer, I think Souter is the safer choice.
|
salinen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:02 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I like George Mitchell |
Drifter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Psssttttthhhhhhhh .... |
|
Crap, I thought that said George Micheals (from WHAM fame).
Had a good laugh, but at the expense of my keyboard and monitor.
Cheers Drifter
|
MikeG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
9. Too old. We need a forty year justice. |
SCantiGOP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:02 PM
Response to Original message |
Bronco69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:03 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Bill Clinton! :-) Wouldn't that be a kick in the head to the repukes? LOL
|
dolstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:04 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I think there's a good chance Kerry would elevate an associate justice, and Souter best fits Kerry's criteria. And since he was appointed by a Republican president, it would appear to be a bipartisan gesture.
|
bemildred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Souter would be excellent. nt |
mikehiggins
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:05 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Sauter would do, but I suspect Kerry would look to add another |
|
liberal voice, not just replace the outgoing CJ.
Who that might be I simply cannot imagine.
|
bemildred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. Want lots of new blood, but making someone CJ still leave a vacancy. nt |
MikeG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:08 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I, MikeG, am 46 and licensed to practice law. |
|
Edited on Mon Nov-01-04 04:10 PM by MikeG
|
freetobegay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:09 PM
Response to Original message |
11. William Jefferson Clinton |
|
He's barred from practing law, but that doesn't stop him from being a Supreme! The ultimate in the slaying of the freeps.
|
NewJeffCT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
18. I'm worried about his health in the long-term |
|
Great choice and not too old... but, the RW would probably filibuster his nomination.
|
Sandpiper
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
|
Hell, they'd probably encourage an armed uprising if Clinton was the nominee.
|
genius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:10 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Someone who cares about the rights of the accused |
MikeG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
16. Messy divorce. Won't get confirmed. |
genius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
29. Half our elected officials are divorced. That's not an issue |
|
Remember Clarence Thomas. He dumped his African-American wife for a rich white one.
|
robsul82
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:10 PM
Response to Original message |
|
And I'm a big fan of the idea of Associate Justice of the Supreme Court William Jefferson Clinton. :)
Later.
RJS
|
dolstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
21. Only a fool would nominate someone who had a quadrupal bypass |
robsul82
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
38. Only a bigger fool wouldn't try. |
kskiska
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:10 PM
Response to Original message |
|
but for longevity's sake, it should be someone younger.
|
djg21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:11 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Soutrer is hardly a "liberal." |
|
He was appointhed by Bush 41, and is fairly centrist. I'd expect Ginsburg to become Chief Justice.
|
dolstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
19. He's as liberal as anyone on the court. |
|
That being the case, it makes more sense to nominate him than someone like Ginsburg, a Clinton nominee who's had colon cancer is unlikely to stay on the court as long as Souter.
|
Sandpiper
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
23. The most liberal member of the court is a Republican appointee |
|
John Paul Stevens.
Chief Justice Warren, liberal icon, was also a Republican appointee.
|
mitchtv
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:11 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Judge Judy ;head and shoulders above 5 of them |
|
common sense has its virtues
|
Bandit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:17 PM
Response to Original message |
Sandpiper
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
22. We want a CJ that will be in for multiple decades |
|
Jimmy's 80 years old, so I don't think he'll be on the short list.
|
4_Legs_Good
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:24 PM
Response to Original message |
|
She's my favorite.
Plus it would be a very nice way to try to bring us together. Plus, she deserves it.
david
|
ShaneGR
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
26. O'Connor won't make it another 4 years |
|
I think Kerry gets the chance to nominate 2 justices.
|
4_Legs_Good
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
28. I think you're right, but give her a couple years at Chief Justice |
|
And put the new guy/woman in as an associate.
It'll help heal the massive Bush divisions in the country.
david
|
genius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
31. She belongs in jail. Kerry might as well appoint Rove. |
4_Legs_Good
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
33. :) She made one really bad judgement... |
|
but she's tried to make up for it since then.
She's the one justice, IMO, that takes each case on its merit more than on his/her ideology. I love Stevens, but I wish all the justices were more like O'Connor.
david
|
genius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
30. She's a right-wing nutcase |
|
He needs to appoint someone who's not a crazy right-winger.
|
4_Legs_Good
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
34. Why is she a right-wing nutcase? |
|
She's not always right, but she's not always wrong either. I think she's a good moderate who is thinking about the what's best, not about political ideology.
I may be wrong, but since 2001, I think she's made mostly good judgements.
david
|
atre
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
36. You must not read many of her opinions |
|
She's among the worst on the Court.
|
Stinky The Clown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:41 PM
Response to Original message |
27. Sen George Mitchell, hands down |
sidwill
(975 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:56 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
She wrote the dissenting opinion in BUsh V Gore.
|
4_Legs_Good
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
35. I thought Stevens did. I remember his |
|
"it may never be clear who was the winner, but it's crystal clear who is the loser - the American people's trust in the Supreme Court..."
or something like that.
Ahhhhhhhhh
david
|
atre
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 06:03 PM
Response to Original message |
37. Harvard Law Professor Laurence H. Tribe |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:31 AM
Response to Original message |