AnIndependentTexan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-02-04 01:12 PM
Original message |
GOP loses challenge in Ohio, No poll challengers |
WilliamPitt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-02-04 01:12 PM
Response to Original message |
|
G.O.P. Can Challenge Voters at Ohio Polls, Court Rules http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/110304Y.shtml
|
bpcmxr
(577 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-02-04 01:13 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Given the hour, could this be the final say? |
bpcmxr
(577 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-02-04 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
Mr_Spock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-02-04 01:13 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Um, didn't read that way to me |
NewYorkerfromMass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-02-04 01:13 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Wrong. CHallenges allowed. nt |
GoBlue
(930 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-02-04 01:13 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Headline "Court OKs Voter Challengers at Ohio Polls"
|
msongs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-02-04 01:14 PM
Response to Original message |
6. the article ACTUALLY says challengers are allowed......eom |
demwing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-02-04 01:15 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Follow the link. It says the exact opposite of your thread title |
|
I think the word we're looking for is "Ooops!"
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 14th 2024, 02:21 AM
Response to Original message |