Proud2BAmurkin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-02-04 11:24 PM
Original message |
If we win OHIO, WISCONSIN, AND NH it's ours |
|
We won't need IA, NM, NV, or FL
|
mconvente
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-02-04 11:25 PM
Response to Original message |
|
nh is really close but we should get that. PLus we should get NV.
|
AlamoDemoc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-02-04 11:26 PM
Response to Original message |
2. We will Ohio, and NH, but I''m sceptical about FL |
|
maybe AR and NM, and NV can fill in
|
pimpbot
(770 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-02-04 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. WE ARE COMING BACK IN WISCONSIN!!! |
|
C'mon, count those dem votes..
|
VOX
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-02-04 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. AR has been called red. |
|
Per NPR, about 15 minutes ago.
|
AlamoDemoc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-02-04 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. There will be a lot of hiccups in FL |
Girlieman
(399 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-02-04 11:27 PM
Response to Original message |
AlamoDemoc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-02-04 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. I am willing to concede on Co, but I am willing |
AlamoDemoc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-02-04 11:32 PM
Original message |
andino
(668 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-02-04 11:32 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Doesn't that bring us to 269? |
|
We still have to get Hawaii
|
Pale_Rider
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-02-04 11:38 PM
Response to Original message |
9. At this time NV is ... |
|
... trending to Kerry. Go Las Vegas!
|
Straight Shooter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-02-04 11:43 PM
Response to Original message |
10. We need NV or there's hell to pay for the trashed Dem registrations |
|
That a**hole Sproul makes me grind my teeth. His company did it in Oregon, too.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 07:27 AM
Response to Original message |