Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jennifer Granholm '08 ? (yes, I know - you'd have to amend...)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 04:40 PM
Original message
Jennifer Granholm '08 ? (yes, I know - you'd have to amend...)
I understand people's fear or an Arnold Schwarzenegger campaign. However, I highly doubt that within 4 years the right-wing of the GOP will EVER nominate him. The guy is a social liberal. The Republicans are OWNED by the Christian Right.

For that reason, the proposed amendment doesn't bother me. As a 2nd-generation American, I know many friends in the immigrant community who would be barred from ever becoming president solely because they moved to this country when they were 3. Children adopted from China? Nope, they're not allowed.

Anyway, I think the amendment would help US far more then it would help them.

I truly think Jennifer Granholm, governor of Michigan, would be an ideal candidate in 2008. She comes from a powerful Midwestern swing state, she's charismatic, attractive, effective, liberal but not "scary" to non-liberals, woman, lacks Hillary's divisiveness.

Anybody else think Granholm in '08 would be really promising?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
americanwomanone Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. She Has Flip-Flopped and lost my vote, n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Flip-flopped on what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanwomanone Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Well for one lifting the ban on dove hunting after 99 years.
It isn't so much the lifting of the ban as her telling those of us that care she would never lift the ban. Well guess what, she did. She caved and lost me as a supporter. I have been behind her for her whole political career and was extremely disappointed in her for not sticking by what she promised. I don't like people that say one thing and do another. I guess Ted Nugent got to her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
purji Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. I'm pretty mad about that myself
said she wouldn't than did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanwomanone Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I just don't think she would stand up over something more serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Republican power brokers would do what
it takes to smooth things over with the fundies, and Arnold would destroy her. Of course, I don't think she'd even win the nomination in the first place, so this is kind of a waste. But Arnold would crush her in a general, and he would reach the general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. The Repub party doesn't exist without the fundys anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Arnold would have to move a little bit to the right,
the top Republicans would use some scare tactics on the fundies (We need him to beat Hillary!!!!), California would go red and it would be game fucking over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. No, they would never trust him. The only reason Bush gets four more
years is because of the fundys. They will not leave them now. That party is practically a theocracy now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think you overestimate the fundies.
They are ruled by fear, fear of gays, fear of atheism, all that stuff. It's easy to manipulate such people. Hell, Arnold could just pick a fundy-friendly VP candidate, Bill Frist comes to mind, and imply that guy would be his Dick Cheney, his puppet master, and they'd be reassured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, I love her. People talking about Rudy or Arnold are crazy. The RW
fundys would NEVER let that happen.

I say we ride this wave for our own purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. you're not going to pass an amendment in four years...
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ktowntennesseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. They're just as apt to re-elect W in '08!
While they're busy amending the Constitution, they might decide its better to take out the term-limit and appoint Chimp for life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tweed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yeah Canadians have TONS of respect in America
Why didn't we try to amend the constitution before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. This is not a time for picking candidates
We need to regroup and not clutch at straws. No one person is going to save us. We need to build a patient foundation cemented in our core values. This will come in time.

We are only two days out from the most significant political loss for our side in over 100 years. Let us step back and regain our equilibrium.
We feel desperate. We have been knocked back. It is too soon to know our best approach. Give us two or three weeks to grieve, maybe longer. Then we will be ready to fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Yes.
looking for the ideal candidate in '08 is completely ignoring all the work that needs to be done to reinvigorate the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. No amendment change.
How do you feel about someone being president in more than one country at once?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. No dual citizenship
Requirements: 30 years of American residency, 25 years of American citizenship, no dual citizenship for 20 years, no service in the government of any foreign country in any capacity.

That would fit the vast majority of people who moved here as children - people like Madeline Albright, Felix Frankfurter, Jennifer Granholm, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Wouldn't keep out a older sleeper.
Just too chancey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Not really
The chance of something like that happening are miniscule.

Now, you're free to differ. But the chance of a foreign agent becoming president as a mole of a foreign government is preposterous. There's no reason that someone couldn't be a foreign stooge even if they are natural-born citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC