|
Edited on Thu Nov-04-04 05:43 PM by WI_DEM
Yes, Bush was elected and won over 3 million more popular votes, but voter turnout was very high and its tough to defeat an incumbent at a time of war. There is also the power of the incumbancy as well as the media which is protective of Bush. These were all tough obstacles. But consider this:
Kerry got well over 55,000,000 votes--in the end he will get more than five million more votes than Al Gore did in 2000 and the most votes any Democrat has ever received running for president, and the second highest vote tally in history.
Kerry received 48% of the vote--the same percentage that Gore got in 2000--and only 1-point lower than what Clinton got in his re-election in 1996.
Had only 129,000 voters (or less, we don't know what the final count in Ohio will be) in Ohio had switched, Kerry would have won the electoral vote and been elected president.
As it is Bush will win only at most 286 electoral votes, only 16 more than needed to win the narrowest electoral and popular vote victory of any president to win re-election since 1916.
Outside of the South, Kerry won the popular vote with 39,463,933 votes to Bush's 37,078,825--a nearly 2.4 million vote plurality, unfortunately, Kerry only received 42.2% of the Southern vote, losing by nearly 6 million votes--22,029,570 for Bush to 16,090,181 for Kerry.
Obviously the south is a major problem
Bush clearly won no mandate, this country is still polarized and heavily divided.
|