Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

People like Walt Starr, Are They abandoning 55 million Dems

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Nimble_Idea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 09:39 PM
Original message
People like Walt Starr, Are They abandoning 55 million Dems
Edited on Thu Nov-04-04 09:40 PM by Nimble_Idea
YUP THEY SURE ARE

I bet they feel like we should give the pukes a mandate.

TO HELL WITH THAT.

NO JUDGE THAT SHRUB APPOINTS SHOULD EVER GET APPROVED.
STOP ANY SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, NO SUPREME COURT IS BETTER THAN A PUKE COURT. That way no FUNDIE laws can be passed.

Seriously, We can't let ideas like this and The DLC let this happen.

THERE WAS NO MANDATE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ahh, a thread that has called me out
and obviously the poster of the thread has not read a single word I've actually written on the subject.

Here are the facts. Rhenquist will be retiring very soon. This is a fact, Rhenquist is one of the most rightwing activist justices presently on the court. This is also an irrefutable fact.

When his replacement comes up, Bush will first nominate the most far right wing jurist possible in hopes of a filibuster. After that nomination is borked, he will nominate a moderate, the Democrats will confirm, and Bush gets precisely what he wants. Abortion will not end with this nomination and he still holds it as his "get out the base" card for 2006.

The "nasty baby murdering Democrats" are painted as obstructionists and the congressional midterms are now nationalized.

End of the day after the midterm elections of 2006, and the Dems are left with 39 seats in the Senate and will never mount another filibuster.

Now let's look at it under my strategy. When the nominee omes before the Senate committee, the Democratic committee members ask their questions nicely, get the answers on the record, and vote to move the thing forward. The Republicans will become a bit nervous because they are losing their bogeyman.

When it comes for an up or down vote, every Democrat "abstains in the interest of national unity". Right Wing activist judge is now confirmed, replacing a right wing activist judge. Net gain on the court for the Republicans = 0. But now the Republicans are in a tizzy, especially those like Chaffee and Snowe, who are up for re-election. They will have to come to the Democrats and ask for a filibuster when O'Connor steps down. The Democrats agree to it on a single condition, the moderate Republicans must initate the filibuster and the Democrats fall in line.

End of the day, the Republicans are the obstructionists and the Democrats have worked in the spirit of bipartisanship. During the midterms, it won;t be a national election and we can potentially pick up a couple of seats in the Senate.

Either way, we end up with a right wing judge. One way wins, the other loses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ignore these fuckos.
They don't have a clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. This is a bad forum for this sort of thing, too
Not enough space or time to accurately put my thoughts on this out there.

I'm doing better on the letters I'm crafting for the Senators, Congressmen, and Governors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. That's a dangerous strategy but intriguing
The problem as I see it is that it may have worked with Reagan or Bush I. At home, late at night, when no one was looking, they were social liberals on a lot of issues.

The problem is, Bush, Cheney, Ashcroft and the gang may really fucking mean it. And Cheney is especially dangerous, because he is not running in 2008. And Bush is going to do his four years and spend the next thirty clearing brush in Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Jacobin Donating Member (820 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. This is a better explanation than the first time.
I like it, especially the explanation of "no net loss".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Give it a rest. Walt has proven he is in it for the correct reasons
We need to heal. Stop the name-calling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azure Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. The only way to stop all this...
...is to come together and agree to hand ALL these issues over to the states. Abortion and gay marriage being the first two. Let the repukes in the red states have backalley abortions with coathangers. After all, THAT IS WHAT THEY VOTED FOR. We liberals will move to blue states and keep our policies to ourselves, just as they have been BEGGING us to do for years. Give them what they want, and see how they like it.

It's time for liberals to stop being concerned about the welfare of people who hate us with a passion. Every time we try to help them, they spit on us and tell us they don't want our interference. Let's wake up and quit trying to force the good society down their throats. If they want to be a third world nation, LET THEM. We will stay in our own blue states leave them to their own fate, which THEY ASKED FOR.

It's the only way. We won't win again in the forseeable future. Red America DOES NOT WANT what we have to give. Let's withdraw the offer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC