Bread and Circus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-04-04 09:46 PM
Original message |
Poll question: DU'er Demographics: City slicker or Country Bumpkin? |
|
Edited on Thu Nov-04-04 09:48 PM by familydoctor
My theory is that Dems can't beat the "conservative" base because they are mostly city people that just don't understand (nor do they really want to understand) their political enemy. I am originally from and live in a town of about 8,000 folks (county of 40,000) which literally votes 70% straight lever Republican. I feel I know how the average Bush voter thinks because I grew up here, my friends are very Pro-Republican, and I can't go through a family gathering without getting into an argument. Also, most of my patients are conservative Bush voters. What I gather from DU and reading "liberal thought" outlets is that Lefties don't really know what they are up against and therefore can't "get in the minds" of those they wish to persuade.
In my opinion the "two Americas" we see is really not red states vs. blue states. It's really red rural areas vs. blue urban areas in all but very, very few places.
The reason why I think this is a cautionary point is because "revolutions" and "social transformations" often start in the rural areas where a propagandized message can be delivered without the "noise" of dissenting opinion that is often found among the ambitious and high educated city folk. Many a communist country got it's start on the way to its current state via dirt roads.
So please humor me for a moment and vote in this poll. I'd like to see how many Du'ers are living in a rural area that votes red as opposed to DU'ers that live in the cities.
My guess is that most DU'ers are from the "big city" and a smaller portion are from red rural areas (like me). I bet fewer are from red Urban areas and probably very few here are from blue rural areas.
___
Just so folks know, I went to med school in San Francisco (UCSF) in one of the most "liberal" med schools in a very liberal city. I found that when I told people I was from the podunk midwest, I got a very icy reception. The only people that were nice to me in med school were the black med students and my Vietname room-mates. Being a white male from the midwest, I had never before felt prejudice. But when I went to SF with a flannel shirt and a beard, people made fun of me and called me Brawny man (except for the Blacks and the Vietnamese, which were my friends). It was at that time I realized a few things. First, being on the receiving end of prejudice feels like shit and two, Liberal folks that get all preachy about tolerance can be every bit as two-faced and bigoted as the racist dickheads in my hometown. I hear a lot of that prejudice on DU towards the red areas. It's glib and serves only to perpetuate a losing political strategy. I am not arguing that people need to "embrace the rural agenda", I don't. But I do argue that if liberal/progressive politics are to make a comeback, Dems better get down from the high horse and get in the minds of the rural voter. They can be persuaded, but you gotta figure out what makes them tick.
|
DaveinMD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-04-04 09:50 PM
Response to Original message |
Bread and Circus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-04-04 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. A suburb is urban in my opinion, spelled sub-URB (not sub-rur) |
Bread and Circus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-04-04 10:05 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Kick, so I can get a larger "N". |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:14 PM
Response to Original message |