Three States to Compare: Red vs. Blue...Anything look suspicious?

[KoKo]

Here are three states from CNN's site as to the Red and Blue Counties according to the reported vote.

Here are FLA, SC and NC. Now, one would assume Rove and the boys figured SC as SAFE...so they didn't tamper with the vote. They considered NC a question mark...favorite son Kerry...but let's fuss with some Diebold machines somewhere, just in case. Then look at Florida and look at all that RED, RED, RED...flashing. Does Florida with it's big footprint and diverse population really only attract RW Fundamentalist/Evangelical Christians who move their to retire or for job opportunities?

What do these different county maps show you? It looks like fraud to me. How can it be that both SC (noted Values Territory) and NC (more diversified by far, but went for Bush) and Florida (noted home of those seeking sun, fun, retirement and lifestyle differ in that Florida is the only state of the three that's mostly red? Why would the most diversified state given the influx in the last years be only for Bush???

Tell me? Here are the links to hit on... Which state would be most controlled by Bush? Which state would get a pass because they were confident of the result and which state did they "slightly tamper with" but not go so far that they made it look like SC and Florida in the Red Zone?

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/SC/P/00/

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/FL/P/00/

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/NC/P/00/

[m berst]

1. yes

The evidence there is sufficient to warrant suspicion, and suspicion about the integrity of an election is sufficient grounds for an immediate investigation. No question here. Absolutely. Where are all the people who said "we won't roll over next time?"

[KoKo]

2. Kick...the links are good for maps to the counties and how they voted in

your own states too! I can't post the maps because they are in "flash" but they come up quick even on "Dial Up."