terrya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 08:23 AM
Original message |
Ashcroft is resigning. There's your next Supreme Court Justice. |
bicentennial_baby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 08:24 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Just occured to me last night |
novadem
(211 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 08:25 AM
Response to Original message |
|
A lot of folks are saying he was dead weight. If that was the case he would have been let go prior to the election.
He is resigning soon as AG to get a break and get his house in order in time for a nasty nomination battle.
|
ProdigalJunkMail
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 08:25 AM
Response to Original message |
3. i agree...he is going to be nominated soon |
|
should be an interesting battle to watch...
theProdigal
|
jfalchion
(212 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 08:53 AM
Response to Original message |
|
They want to control the courts for ~30 years. I expect nominations of people about 40. G-d help us.
Reid and Schumer can help, of course.
:kick:
|
Must_B_Free
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
19. He might have some serious health problems too |
|
the pancreas is not something to have going wrong.
|
mtnester
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
27. GOD will NOT help us... |
|
that is painfully obvious
|
liberalpress
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 08:53 AM
Response to Original message |
5. And think about this if you dare... |
|
Chief Justice Clarence Thomas
|
jfalchion
(212 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
Think about CJ Ann Coulter.
|
blondeatlast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 08:54 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Crap. See the post above. |
|
Edited on Fri Nov-05-04 08:55 AM by blondeatlast
I was just thinking about SCOTUS. Damn, terrya, you're right. I wondered why he was leaving. It's all so clear now. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x1327065
|
peekaloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 08:54 AM
Response to Original message |
7. would make for a VERY interesting Senate confirmation. |
Catfight
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 09:00 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Roy Hill, I think that's his name, the wack job and the 10 commandments. |
|
He will be the nomination.
|
SangamonTaylor
(537 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. that would be Roy Moore |
|
former Chief justice of the Mississippi Supreme Court.
He would certainly be Borked.
|
Catfight
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. WTFever...Roy Moore bigotry...why not. Bush WILL attempt to appoint |
Zuni
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
14. Alabama, not Mississippi |
antigone382
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 09:16 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Thta's what my daughter's been saying |
|
Personally I've nominated him for the "Gets a Divinely Granted Painful, Debilitating, Deadly Creeping Crud Disease" Department.
|
antigone382
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
38. Umm, someone's been posting under my username again! |
|
Not to mention any names--cough--buddyhollysghost--cough.
I AM the daughter, and BHG is the mom. Yet another computer mishap.
Oh well, no hard feelins'.
But God, the idea of us being stuck with Asscrack until he dies...what a painful thought. :hurts: We'll all be wearing burkas within a decade.
|
Silverhair
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 12:36 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Ashcroft is 62. They will want someone younger. |
|
They will be looking for someone in his/her 40's, so that once they are on the court, they can stay there longer. They aren't stupid.
|
Zuni
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. Besides, our minority would filibuster the hell out of him |
glitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
21. Is that all? He looks much older. Must be all that godly living.nt |
Bossy Monkey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 12:46 PM
Response to Original message |
16. He's looking for the next dead guy to lose to n/t |
newyawker99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
catmandu57
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 12:55 PM
Response to Original message |
|
There was a photo of herr assmunch on the front page of the local rag, he looked like death warmed over. Herr assmunch is not going to be amongst the living for long looking like that.
|
chimp chump
(132 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 01:08 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Bush will push Scalia for Chief. Scalia is what he's promised for a long time. And Scalia is a lot smarter and a better constitutional lawyer than Thomas. And Scalia is willing to take all the heat too.
Look for Bush S.C. appointees to be 45-53 years old. He'll want to leave a lasting legacy.
I do wonder if some of these justices will hold out, not wanting Bush to replace them. Even the Republican justices may not want him to choose their successor. But it looks like there'll be no choice for Rehnquist. His health problems are just too severe for him to last, I think.
A year from now, there's gonna be a new chief justice, probably Scalia.
Watch for Frist and the GOP senate to change their internal procedural rules on confirmation of justices. They're going to shift into high gear and force up/down votes. Remember, the filibuster is only a longstanding senate procedural tradition. Not a constitutional requirement.
|
terrya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
22. Souter's health is ok. I'm worried about Stevens. |
|
He's 84. I sincerely hope his health will be ok for the next 4 years.
And presumably, Ginsburg and Breyer are ok.
|
chimp chump
(132 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
23. the health of current justices. |
|
I've been surprised that Stevens seems to be holding up so well. I've no doubt he will hold out until 2008 if at all possible.
Breyer is younger and presumably in good health.
You may recall that Ginsberg had treatment for colon cancer in 1999. But I haven't heard much more.
O'Connor seems frail and I've read a few bits about her health being poor but nothing imminently threatening. Just advancing age.
|
glitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 01:12 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Good - he's old and sick and won't last long.nt |
against all enemies
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 06:04 PM
Response to Original message |
24. Come on, he is leaving for health reasons. Republicans are NOT |
|
going to put some one old and unhealthy on the Supreme Court. They want some one who will torture us for 50 years. I'll take your bet.
|
October
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 06:05 PM
Response to Original message |
25. That's what my husband said when he first heard...Damn |
David Zephyr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 06:15 PM
Response to Original message |
26. Well, we've said the same thing in our home... |
|
but didn't want to post it or breathe it because it is so unthinkable.
But now that you've opened it up, I think that Ascroft will be Bush's first SCOTUS nominee and for Chief Justice.
|
TheWebHead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 06:36 PM
Response to Original message |
28. Bush won't pick someone as old as Asscroft |
|
it's more likely he picks someone in their early to mid 50s to get maximum impact. Plus Ashcroft would never be confirmed, as there would be a bloodbath for blue state republican Senators in '06 forward if they went along and put him in.
|
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 07:22 PM
Response to Original message |
29. That's what I fear. Thanks Nader!!!1 |
Nikepallas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 07:33 PM
Response to Original message |
30. Had that thought yesterday. |
msanthrope
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 08:00 PM
Response to Original message |
31. Any Democrat who does not filibuster |
|
that asshole must be hunted down and cast out from the party....
|
terrya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
32. Are there enough votes to filibuster now? |
|
45 Senators...is that enough?
|
DaveinMD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
TheWebHead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
|
Arlen Specter, Lincoln Chafee, Olympia Snowe, and Susan Collins to the list that will block the nutty right nominees.
|
blondeatlast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
39. There was a small degree of good to come out of 11/2--yes; it takes 41. |
|
Praise the Lord--I mean it.
|
11 Bravo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 08:06 PM
Response to Original message |
|
And that stands for No. Fucking. Chance. Won't happen.
|
iwantmycountryback
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-05-04 08:10 PM
Response to Original message |
36. How many votes are needed in the Senate for it to be approved? |
|
Because Republican moderates like Chaffee, Specter, Snowe, and Collins will not approve this guy one would hope.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:29 AM
Response to Original message |